These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5027358)

  • 1. A critique of speech recognition testing preliminary to hearing therapy.
    Schultz MC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 May; 37(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 5027358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of the California Consonant Test.
    Owens E; Schubert ED
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Sep; 20(3):463-74. PubMed ID: 904308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An investigation of the efficacy of transdermal therapy on sensori-neural hypacusis.
    Brooks SA; Harrison RJ
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 1092039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses.
    Carhart R; Tillman TW
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1970 Mar; 91(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 5414080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Some psychometric properties of the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities (TBAC).
    Christopherson LA; Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):929-35. PubMed ID: 1405548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distorted speech audiometry. A methodological and clinical study.
    Korsan-Bengtsen M
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1973; 310():1-75. PubMed ID: 4521066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorical judgment and the Wepman Test of auditory discrimination.
    Vellutino FR; DeSetto L; Steger JA
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 May; 37(2):252-7. PubMed ID: 5027363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Keith RW; Talis HP
    Audiology; 1972; 11(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 4669918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Role of perceptual acclimatization in the selection of frequency responses for hearing aids.
    Gatehouse S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):296-306. PubMed ID: 8219296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Frequency modulated tone thresholds in normal and abnormally adapting ears.
    Young IM; Harbert F
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1970 Feb; 79(1):138-44. PubMed ID: 5415599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory training and speech discrimination.
    Bode DL; Oyer HJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Dec; 13(4):839-55. PubMed ID: 5491358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Speech audiometry for indication of conventional and implantable hearing aids].
    Hoppe U; Hast A
    HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 27921115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Choice of criteria for classifying the forms of hearing loss applicable to the aims of hearing aids].
    Bazarov VG; Moroz BS; Tishchenko NI; Gekht IuK
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981; (4):21-6. PubMed ID: 7303367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Application of a high-frequency consonant discrimination word list in hearing-aid evaluation.
    Gardner HJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1971 Aug; 36(3):354-5. PubMed ID: 5566114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Studies on qualitative speech recognition, sound recognition and auditory threshold].
    Müller K
    Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1978; 30(4):303-13. PubMed ID: 730095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Further investigation of vowel items in multiple-choice speech discrimination testing.
    Owens E; Benedict M; Schubert ED
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Dec; 14(4):841-7. PubMed ID: 5163913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Fairbanks Rhyme Test and CID auditory test W-22 in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Kopra LL; Blosser D; Waldron DL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):735-9. PubMed ID: 5719227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical psychophysics. Illustrated by the problem of auditory overload.
    de Boer E; Bouwmeester J
    Audiology; 1975; 14(4):274-99. PubMed ID: 1147850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.