These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5027358)
21. Relationship of auditory distortion test results to speech discrimination through flat vs. selective amplifying systems. Thompson G; Lassman F J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Sep; 12(3):594-606. PubMed ID: 5811850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Hearing status, causes of impairment and rehabilitation of the hard-of-hearing students in the elementary school]. Zaleski T Otolaryngol Pol; 1994; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 7808755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The performance of children with auditory perceptual disorders on a time-compressed speech discrimination measure. Manning WH; Johnston KL; Beasley DS J Speech Hear Disord; 1977 Feb; 42(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 839757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations. Aniansson G Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario. Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies. ; ; ; ; Pediatrics; 2000 Oct; 106(4):798-817. PubMed ID: 11015525 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods. Singh G; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):733-40. PubMed ID: 20874047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A method to establish the effect of the hearing aid in noise using Victoreen signal threshold and speech discrimination. Lindström B; Svärd I; Bredberg G; Lundborg T Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():45-55. PubMed ID: 6577574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of hearing aids with amplitude compression. Nábĕlek IV; Robinette LN Audiology; 1977; 16(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 836256 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech audiometry by a speech synthesizer. I. A preliminary report. Rahko T; Karjalainen MA; Laine UK; Lavonen S Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979; 222(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 435169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Selective amplification--a review and evaluation. Lybarger SF J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(6):258-66. PubMed ID: 681198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students. Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement in hearing aid selection. Rappaport BZ; Tait CA Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Mar; 102(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 1267684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]