These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5027358)

  • 21. Relationship of auditory distortion test results to speech discrimination through flat vs. selective amplifying systems.
    Thompson G; Lassman F
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Sep; 12(3):594-606. PubMed ID: 5811850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Hearing status, causes of impairment and rehabilitation of the hard-of-hearing students in the elementary school].
    Zaleski T
    Otolaryngol Pol; 1994; 48(5):473-7. PubMed ID: 7808755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The performance of children with auditory perceptual disorders on a time-compressed speech discrimination measure.
    Manning WH; Johnston KL; Beasley DS
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1977 Feb; 42(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 839757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Pediatric audiology: a review.
    Gregg RB; Wiorek LS; Arvedson JC
    Pediatr Rev; 2004 Jul; 25(7):224-34. PubMed ID: 15231988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Psychoacoustic evaluation of present prostheses.
    Bilger RC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1977; 86(3 Pt 3 Suppl 38):92-104. PubMed ID: 405915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T; Wagener KC; Latzel M
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing, American Academy of Audiology, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, and Directors of Speech and Hearing Programs in State Health and Welfare Agencies.
    ; ; ; ;
    Pediatrics; 2000 Oct; 106(4):798-817. PubMed ID: 11015525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods.
    Singh G; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):733-40. PubMed ID: 20874047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A method to establish the effect of the hearing aid in noise using Victoreen signal threshold and speech discrimination.
    Lindström B; Svärd I; Bredberg G; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():45-55. PubMed ID: 6577574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Auditory rehabilitation path for children].
    Hyvärinen A; Dietz A; Löppönen H
    Duodecim; 2011; 127(8):819-25. PubMed ID: 21568108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparison of hearing aids with amplitude compression.
    Nábĕlek IV; Robinette LN
    Audiology; 1977; 16(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 836256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Speech audiometry by a speech synthesizer. I. A preliminary report.
    Rahko T; Karjalainen MA; Laine UK; Lavonen S
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1979; 222(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 435169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selective amplification--a review and evaluation.
    Lybarger SF
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1978; 3(6):258-66. PubMed ID: 681198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Acoustic reflex threshold measurement in hearing aid selection.
    Rappaport BZ; Tait CA
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Mar; 102(3):129-32. PubMed ID: 1267684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Principles of hearing aids].
    Thiede O; Stoll W
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2005 May; 84(5):357-70; quiz 371-4. PubMed ID: 15909248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tolerable delay for speech production and perception: effects of hearing ability and experience with hearing aids.
    Goehring T; Chapman JL; Bleeck S; Monaghan JJM
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):61-68. PubMed ID: 28838277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. "Say-stay" identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson PB; Nittrouer S; Norton SJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Mar; 97(3):1830-8. PubMed ID: 7699164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Temporal and masking phenomena in persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Elliott LL
    Audiology; 1975; 14(4):336-53. PubMed ID: 1096866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.