These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 502926)
1. The feasibility of bench tests for disposable ECG electrode adhesiveness. Baker CD; Schoenberg AA; Booth HE Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):285-8. PubMed ID: 502926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development of standard test methods for evaluating defibrillation recovery characteristics of disposable ECG electrodes. Schoenberg AA; Booth HE; Lyon PC Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 502921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. ECG electrodes. A study of electrical and mechanical long-term properties. Ask P; Oberg PA; Odman S; Tenland T; Skogh M Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1979 Apr; 23(2):189-206. PubMed ID: 442948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time and frequency dependence of disposable ECG electrode-skin impedance. Olson WH; Schmincke DR; Henley BL Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 502923 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of gel-to-gel and skin measurements of electrode impedance. Klingler DR; Schoenberg AA; Worth NP; Egleston CF; Burkart JA Med Instrum; 1979; 13(5):266-8. PubMed ID: 502922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of commercially available electrodes and gels for recording of slow EEG potentials. Tallgren P; Vanhatalo S; Kaila K; Voipio J Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Apr; 116(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 15792889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of limb electrode placement on the 12- and 16-lead electrocardiogram. Farrell RM; Syed A; Syed A; Gutterman DD J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(6):536-45. PubMed ID: 18790505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrode site preparation techniques: a follow-up study. Clochesy JM; Cifani L; Howe K Heart Lung; 1991 Jan; 20(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 1988388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of ECG electrode placement by emergency department clinicians. McCann K; Holdgate A; Mahammad R; Waddington A Emerg Med Australas; 2007 Oct; 19(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 17919217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preliminary studies on the relationship among peel force, quantitative measures of skin damage and subjective discomfort. Murahata RI; Taylor MG; Damia J; Grove GL Skin Res Technol; 2008 Nov; 14(4):478-83. PubMed ID: 18937785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low Impedance Carbon Adhesive Electrodes with Long Shelf Life. Posada-Quintero HF; Reyes BA; Burnham K; Pennace J; Chon KH Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2374-82. PubMed ID: 25691400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Effect of 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent on stainless steel and silica surface]. Umemoto K; Kurata S; Shimoyama K; Yamanaka A Shika Zairyo Kikai; 1990 May; 9(3):444-8. PubMed ID: 1966925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of disposable ear canal electrodes in auditory brainstem response testing. Ruth RA; Mills JA; Ferraro JA Am J Otol; 1988 Jul; 9(4):310-5. PubMed ID: 3177615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of adhesive retention of maxillofacial prostheses. Part 2: Time and reapplication effects. Kiat-Amnuay S; Gettleman L; Khan Z; Goldsmith LJ J Prosthet Dent; 2001 May; 85(5):438-41. PubMed ID: 11357068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]