These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5031347)
1. Effects of time pressure on the management of aggression in TAT stories. Fiester S; Siipola E J Pers Assess; 1972 Jun; 36(3):230-40. PubMed ID: 5031347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hostility on the TAT as a function of defensive inhibition and stimulus situation. Megargee EI J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1967 Aug; 31(4):73-9. PubMed ID: 4383008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of female aggressiveness on aggressive and sexual fantasies. Barclay AM J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1970 Feb; 34(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 5414423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Sexual and aggressive fantasies in violent and non-violent prison inmates. Beit-Hallahmi B J Pers Assess; 1971 Aug; 35(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 5566748 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The relationship between behavioral indices of aggression and hostile content on the TAT. Matranga JT J Pers Assess; 1976 Apr; 40(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 957083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hostility of asocial youth as measured by the TAT and Rorschach. Kalliopuska M Percept Mot Skills; 1992 Apr; 74(2):563-6. PubMed ID: 1594417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measures of aggression in questionnaire ratings and stories from the Apperceptive Personality Test. Condrell C; Karp SA; Holmstrom RW; Silber DE Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Jun; 86(3 Pt 2):1187-91. PubMed ID: 9700791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of cue relevance, ambiguity, and self-reported hostility on TAT responses. Kaplan MF J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1967 Dec; 31(6):45-50. PubMed ID: 6081922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On the measurement of hostility, aggression anxiety, projection and dependency. Kinzie W; Zimmer H J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1968 Aug; 32(4):388-91. PubMed ID: 5673731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. PROJECTION OF HOSTILITY ON THE TAT AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS, BACKGROUND, AND PERSONALITY VARIABLES. MURSTEIN BI J Consult Psychol; 1965 Feb; 29():43-8. PubMed ID: 14277397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Defense Mechanism Card Pull in TAT Stories. Cramer P J Pers Assess; 2017; 99(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 27484927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sex differences, sex roles, and projection on the TAT: matching stimulus to examinee gender. Katz HE; Russ SW; Overholser JC J Pers Assess; 1993 Feb; 60(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 8433266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sex differences in TAT ambiguity, hostility, and projection. Murstein BI J Genet Psychol; 1966 Mar; 108(1st Half):71-80. PubMed ID: 5908847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Anger and the use of defense mechanisms in college students. Cramer P J Pers; 1991 Mar; 59(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 2037963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 'Replication' or, who knows what we're talking about anyway? May R J Pers Assess; 1971 Oct; 35(5):420-1. PubMed ID: 5113657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Children's Apperception Test: possible applications for adults. Kitron DG; Benziman H Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 1990; 27(1):29-47. PubMed ID: 2365582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex differences in children's expression and control of fantasy and overt aggression. Brodzinsky DM; Messer SB; Tew JD Child Dev; 1979 Jun; 50(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 487878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]