These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate. Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring in low-risk pregnancies. Westgren M; Ingemarsson E; Ingemarsson I; Solum T Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Sep; 56(3):301-4. PubMed ID: 7422168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Fetal distress as an indication of cesarean section]. Xin YY Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1983 Oct; 18(4):212-4. PubMed ID: 6675918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Cardiotocographic monitoring of birth. Changes in the incidence of Cesarian section and in the condition of the infants as estimated by the Apgar score]. Qvist N; Sørensen J; Grydehøj P Ugeskr Laeger; 1982 Oct; 144(43):3164-6. PubMed ID: 7157534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Benefits and detriments of fetal heart rate monitoring. Parer JT Semin Perinatol; 1978 Apr; 2(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 734449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized trial of electronic fetal monitoring in preterm labor. Luthy DA; Shy KK; van Belle G; Larson EB; Hughes JP; Benedetti TJ; Brown ZA; Effer S; King JF; Stenchever MA Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):687-95. PubMed ID: 3554055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Evolution of indications for cesarean section between 1991 and 2000 in materials from the Pathology Clinic in the Department of Pregnancy and Labor, Pomeranian Medical University in Szczecin]. Bilar M Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():173-92. PubMed ID: 15552847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Statistical and clinical studies on cesarean section (review of 1,499 cases)]. Alegre Villariz A; Garitano Caballero C; Gándara Ibarra A; Aranguren Duo G Acta Obstet Ginecol Hisp Lusit; 1977 Nov; 25(8):459-78. PubMed ID: 607743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [The intensity of fetal movements vs. amnioscopy and cardiotocography in assessing fetal well-being]. Panduro Barón JG; Guzmán Sánchez A; Pantoja Rojas A; Miranda Salcedo JT Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1993 Apr; 61():92-5. PubMed ID: 8406121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antepartum nonstress test and the postmature pregnancy. Fleischer A; Schulman H; Farmakides G; Perrotta LA; McGovern G; Katz N Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jul; 66(1):80-3. PubMed ID: 4011074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Usefulness of monitoring of fetal biophysics during cesarean section]. Bandelier R; Maye D Gynakol Rundsch; 1976; 16 Suppl 1():47-9. PubMed ID: 1035886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Successful management of quadruplet pregnancy in a perinatal unit. Shennan AT; Milligan JE; Yeung PK Can Med Assoc J; 1979 Sep; 121(6):741-5. PubMed ID: 519612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VII. The impact of mode of delivery on fetal outcome. Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Smith PJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 143(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 7081332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fetal surveillance vs. labor induction at 42 weeks in postterm gestation. Dyson DC J Reprod Med; 1988 Mar; 33(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 3361516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal monitoring. A retrospective evaluation. Hill DL Minn Med; 1972 May; 55(5):479-81. PubMed ID: 5030468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effect of fetal umbilical cord entanglement on the postnatal status of the newborn infant]. David M; Ruhmland B Zentralbl Gynakol; 1995; 117(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 7740848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]