These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5035125)
1. Scanning and the familiarity effect in tachistoscopic recognition. Mewhort DJ; Cornett S Can J Psychol; 1972 Jun; 26(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 5035125 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scanning chunking, and the familiarity effect in tachistoscopic recognition. Mewhort DJ J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 5013341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tachistoscopic recognition of line orientation. Sasanuma S; Kobayashi Y Neuropsychologia; 1978; 16(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 692850 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Loss of spatial and identity information following a tachistoscopic exposure. Townsend VM J Exp Psychol; 1973 Apr; 98(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 4704202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Components of the familiarity effect in tachistoscopic recognition. Butler B J Exp Psychol; 1973 Dec; 101(2):367-72. PubMed ID: 4753862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration of post-exposural directional scanning and cerebral dominance explanations of lateral differences in trachistoscopic recognition. Fudin R; Masterson CC Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 1272678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Buffer storage modality and identification time in tachistoscopic recognition. Mitchell DC Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Aug; 28(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 1005646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Order of report and order of scanning in tachistoscopic recognition. Scheerer E Can J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 26(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 4656820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A further test of the scanning hypothesis in tachistoscopic recognition. Scheerer E Can J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 27(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 4696075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Relations between the sensory register and short-term storage in tachistoscopic recognition. Dick AO J Exp Psychol; 1969 Nov; 82(2):279-84. PubMed ID: 5378047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and order of report in tachistoscopic identification. Mewhort DJ Can J Psychol; 1974 Sep; 28(3):383-98. PubMed ID: 4429904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Selective attention in visual perception and short-term memory; 'stimulus' set versus 'response' set. Schioldborg P Scand J Psychol; 1972; 13(3):172-7. PubMed ID: 5074080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A note on familiarity and scanning with tachistoscopic recognition. Butler B Can J Psychol; 1979 Jun; 33(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 487290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual processing and the use of redundant information in tachistoscopic recognition. Dick AO Can J Psychol; 1970 Jun; 24(3):133-41. PubMed ID: 5481937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Familiarity effects in visual information processing. Krueger LE Psychol Bull; 1975 Nov; 82(6):949-74. PubMed ID: 1103203 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceived tachistoscopic duration and early visual processing in preschool children and adults. Avant LL; Lyman PJ; Skowronski M; Millspaugh JR J Exp Child Psychol; 1977 Jun; 23(3):348-66. PubMed ID: 886268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence from mutual masking for serial processing of tachistoscopic letter patterns. Nice DS; Harcum ER Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Jun; 42(3):991-1003. PubMed ID: 1272746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]