These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. A reappraisal of intrauterine contraceptive devices. Hall RE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1967 Nov; 99(6):808-13. PubMed ID: 5587394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Perforation of a puerperal uterus with two Lippes loops. Van Praagh IG; Munsick GW; Murdoch DE Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Dec; 105(8):1286-8. PubMed ID: 5360261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Surgical removal of an intrauterine device perforating the sigmoid colon: a case report. Mederos R; Humaran L; Minervini D Int J Surg; 2008 Dec; 6(6):e60-2. PubMed ID: 17409036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Perforation of the uterus with Lippes loop. Epidemiologic analysis. Scutchfield FD; Long WN JAMA; 1969 Jun; 208(12):2335-6. PubMed ID: 5819304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Uterine perforation with intrauterine contraceptive devices. Review of the literature and cases reported to the National Committee on Maternal Health. Burnhill MS; Birnberg CH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1967 May; 98(1):135-40. PubMed ID: 5337138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Primary peritoneal pregnancy: a case report. Dasari P; Devi S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2000 Feb; 26(1):45-7. PubMed ID: 10761331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Intrauterine devices. 3. Effectiveness and adverse effects of modern intrauterine-pessaries]. Canzler E; Rothe K Dtsch Gesundheitsw; 1971 Jul; 26(27):1252-4. PubMed ID: 5093315 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Contraction of the non-pregnant human uterus. Acute effects of the insertion of an intrauterine device. Comparative study of 2 devices]. Guiloff E; Faundes A; Ibarra A; Martinez M; Feldman J; Gomez C Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1969; 34(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 5385856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Perforation of bicornuate uterus by Lippes loop. Chaturachinda K; Ajjimakorn S J Med Assoc Thai; 1971 Sep; 54(9):656-9. PubMed ID: 5126666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. [Case study of a patient with uterine perforation due to intrauterine devices]. Lee LS; Oh BD Taehan Kanho; 1969 Dec; 8(6):58-60. PubMed ID: 5262566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Omental reaction in cases of uterine perforation by the IUCD. Badawy S; Iskander S Contraception; 1974 Jul; 10(1):73-7. PubMed ID: 4613532 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Uterine perforation during removal of a broken Majzlin spring. Siegler AM; Chen CH Fertil Steril; 1972 Oct; 23(10):776-8. PubMed ID: 4651630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Gastrointestinal complications of modern intrauterine devices. Key TC; Kreutner AK Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Feb; 55(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 7352087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Bowel perforation by an intra-uterine contraceptive device. Cohen PL; Sutcliffe TJ S Afr Med J; 1982 Dec; 62(26):973. PubMed ID: 7147142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]