These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 503730)

  • 41. Forest before trees? It depends where you look.
    Grice GR; Canham L; Boroughs JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Feb; 33(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 6844103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. On the young child's comparison of sets.
    Grieve R; Garton A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1981 Dec; 32(3):443-58. PubMed ID: 7320679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. On the detection of letters within redundant arrays.
    Johnson NF
    Percept Psychophys; 1986 Aug; 40(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3763365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Are nominal same-different matches slower due to differences in level of processing or to response competition?
    Eriksen CW; O'Hara WP
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Oct; 32(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 7155779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures.
    Maki RH
    Can J Psychol; 1986 Dec; 40(4):368-87. PubMed ID: 3502879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Interference with face naming.
    Young AW; Flude BM; Ellis AW; Hay DC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1987 Jan; 64(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 3577848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The corroboration time measure: an implicit confidence judgement.
    Nicolson R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1982 Aug; 51(1):27-39. PubMed ID: 7136844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evidence for direct visual access to letter identities.
    Haber RN; Cole RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1980 Dec; 46(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7211436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Why do children confuse mirror-image obliques?
    Corballis MC; Zalik MC
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1977 Dec; 24(3):516-23. PubMed ID: 925601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Development of associative and perceptual interference.
    Grice GR; Canham L; Schafer C
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Oct; 32(4):375-87. PubMed ID: 7155783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comprehension of past and future reference revisited.
    Harner L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1980 Feb; 29(1):170-82. PubMed ID: 7354264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Matching Familiar Figures Test: a primary, secondary, and tertiary evaluation.
    Arizmendi T; Paulsen K; Domino G
    J Clin Psychol; 1981 Oct; 37(4):812-8. PubMed ID: 7309870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On the robustness of the additive factors stage structure in blocked and mixed choice reaction designs.
    Van Duren LL; Sanders AF
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Oct; 69(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 3245478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. An experimental investigation of the role of television in facilitating shape recognition.
    Hofmann RJ; Flook MA
    J Genet Psychol; 1980 Jun; 136(2d Half):305-6. PubMed ID: 7391828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The sensitivity of response measures of alphanumeric legibility to variations in dot matrix display parameters.
    Snyder HL; Taylor GB
    Hum Factors; 1979 Aug; 21(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 478548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Features and objects: the fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.
    Treisman A
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1988 May; 40(2):201-37. PubMed ID: 3406448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. On the selection and evaluation of visual display symbology: factors influencing search and identification times.
    Remington R; Williams D
    Hum Factors; 1986 Aug; 28(4):407-20. PubMed ID: 3793109
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Span and rate of apprehension in children and adults.
    Chi MT; Klahr D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1975 Jun; 19(3):434-9. PubMed ID: 1236928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The development of letter processing efficiency.
    Kaye DB; Brown SW; Post TA; Plude DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1981 Jul; 9(4):378-88. PubMed ID: 7278627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The letter-frequency effect and the generality of familiarity effects on perception.
    Appelman IB; Mayzner MS
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Nov; 30(5):436-46. PubMed ID: 7036082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.