These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5040903)
1. The lawyer's role in involuntary commitment--New York's experience. Kumasaka Y Ment Hyg; 1972; 56(2):21-9. PubMed ID: 5040903 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Objections to involuntary admission to mental hospitals. New York Civil Liberties Union. Psychoanal Rev; 1971; 58(3):385-94. PubMed ID: 5170161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The dilemma of involuntary commitment: suggestions for a measurable alternative. Penn NE; Sindberg R; Roberts A Ment Hyg; 1969 Jan; 53(1):4-9. PubMed ID: 5398901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Maryland's new regulation governing the admission of involuntary patients. Solomon N Md State Med J; 1973 Dec; 22(12):27-8. PubMed ID: 4769883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Suggested revisions of North Carolina's laws on involuntary hospitalization for mental illness. Rollins RL N C Med J; 1972 Dec; 33(12):1019-22. PubMed ID: 4508950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Israel Mental Treatment Act (1955). Civil commitment of the mentally ill in Israel. Miller L Isr Ann Psychiatr Relat Discip; 1969 Apr; 7(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 5258145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [The danger concept in state laws for the commitment of the mentally sick and the drug addicts. 1]. Baumann J Med Klin; 1968 Mar; 63(12):470-4. PubMed ID: 5700454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Pennsylvania civil commitment procedures. A practical guide. Meisel A Pa Med; 1974 Mar; 77(3):47-50. PubMed ID: 4816530 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The danger concept in state laws for the commitment of the mentally sick and drug addicts. 2]. Baumann J Med Klin; 1968 Mar; 63(13):508-11. PubMed ID: 5727266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The rights of mental patients. The new Massachusetts law. Rosner SS Ment Hyg; 1972; 56(1):117-9. PubMed ID: 5014145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Operation Baxstrom after one year. Hunt RC; Wiley ED Am J Psychiatry; 1968 Jan; 124(7):974-8. PubMed ID: 5634401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. New approaches to mental health in the California legislature. Petris NC Int Psychiatry Clin; 1969; 6(3):361-78. PubMed ID: 5351737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The criminalization of mentally disordered behavior: possible side-effect of a new mental health law. Abramson MF Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1972 Apr; 23(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 5023600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Lawyer in a mental hospital: the New York experiment. Meyer EJ Ment Hyg; 1969 Jan; 53(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 5398896 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Swedish psychiatry today. Leche HG Ment Hyg; 1971 Jul; 55(3):404-6. PubMed ID: 4937069 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. At the pleasure of the Crown. Rozovsky LE Can Hosp; 1972 Nov; 49(11):21-2. PubMed ID: 5083037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Symposium--forensic psychiatry. Civil commitment and the danger mandate. Page S; Yates E Can Psychiatr Assoc J; 1973 Aug; 18(4):267-71. PubMed ID: 4780743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The new law for involuntary admission to State Mental Hospitals. Houseman JC Va Med Mon (1918); 1970 Jun; 97(6):391. PubMed ID: 5528118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]