These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5043117)

  • 1. Identification versus discrimination of distinctive features in speech perception.
    Blumstein S; Cooper W
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1972 May; 24(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 5043117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laterality effect in voice recognition.
    Doehring DG; Bartholomeus BN
    Neuropsychologia; 1971 Dec; 9(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 5164376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Anchor referral: a new technique.
    Mostofsky DI
    Neuropsychologia; 1972 Sep; 10(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 5080494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ear differences in the recall of fricatives and vowels.
    Darwin CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 Feb; 23(1):46-62. PubMed ID: 5549664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Speech versus tone processing in compensated dyslexia: discrimination and lateralization with a dichotic mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm.
    Sebastian C; Yasin I
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Nov; 70(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 18801392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The psychophysics of categorical perception.
    Macmillan NA; Kaplan HL; Creelman CD
    Psychol Rev; 1977 Sep; 84(5):452-71. PubMed ID: 905471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ear asymmetry in perception of emotional non-verbal stimuli.
    Carmon A; Nachshon I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1973 Dec; 37(6):351-7. PubMed ID: 4767606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Distorted speech audiometry. A methodological and clinical study.
    Korsan-Bengtsen M
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1973; 310():1-75. PubMed ID: 4521066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Voice gender perception by cochlear implantees.
    Kovacić D; Balaban E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):762-75. PubMed ID: 19640042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perception of simultaneous dichotic and monotic monosyllables.
    Lowe SS; Cullen JK; Berlin CI; Thompson CL; Willett ME
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Dec; 13(4):812-22. PubMed ID: 5491355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of masking-spectrum slope and interaural phase on detection of tones.
    Sonn M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):776-84. PubMed ID: 4842432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Categorical Perception of Speech (VOT) and Analogous Non-Speech (FOT) signals: Behavioral and electrophysiological correlates.
    Horev N; Most T; Pratt H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):111-28. PubMed ID: 17204903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Individual differences in sensitivity to interaural differences in time and level.
    McFadden D; Jeffress LA; Russell WE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Dec; 37(3):755-61. PubMed ID: 4764506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monaural ear differences for same-different reaction times to speech with prior knowledge of ear stimulated.
    Morais J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Dec; 41(3):829-30. PubMed ID: 1215124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The development of auditory figure-ground discrimination and ear asymmetry under nonaural stimulus presentation.
    Howland A; Rasbury W; Heilman KM; Hammer L
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 1975 Jun; 17(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 1204986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Shadowing at one and at two ears.
    Salter D
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 25(4):549-56. PubMed ID: 4767537
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tone discrimination and speech perception benefit in Mandarin-speaking children fit with HiRes fidelity 120 sound processing.
    Chang YT; Yang HM; Lin YH; Liu SH; Wu JL
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):750-7. PubMed ID: 19704359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Valence specific laterality effects in prosody: expectancy account and the effects of morphed prosody and stimulus lead.
    Rodway P; Schepman A
    Brain Cogn; 2007 Feb; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 16950551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection and lateralization of interaural differences of time and level by the blind.
    McFadden D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 4815495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of target-masker similarity on across-ear interference in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task.
    Brungart DS; Simpson BD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1724. PubMed ID: 17927432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.