These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5043626)
1. [Instrumental termination of labor (preliminaries on the use of the Salinas forceps)]. Loren ; De Miguel ; Gómez Calatayud ; Castillo ; Lanzón Acta Obstet Ginecol Hisp Lusit; 1972 Apr; 20(2):89-98. PubMed ID: 5043626 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Application of Salinas' forceps in the variaties of transverse and posterior positions]. Vargas López E; Colorado Murguía S; Castillo Sánchez A; Garza Gutiérrez F Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1974 Jan; 35(207):75-82. PubMed ID: 4827536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Instrumental revision of the uterine cavity after labor]. Magurský V Cesk Gynekol; 1973 May; 38(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 4717901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Labor in short women. Molloy WB Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Sep; 34(3):330-4. PubMed ID: 5805531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Apnea of the newborn in relation to the type of labor and delivery, birth weight and parity of the mother]. Cappello F Arch Ostet Ginecol; 1969; 74(4):311-28. PubMed ID: 5373140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Clinical evaluation of the usefulness of vacuum extractor]. Kietlińska Z; Podsiadlowska W; Stelmachów J Wiad Lek; 1969 Nov; 22(22):2033-9. PubMed ID: 5367273 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [The use of forceps in modern obstetrics]. Sereno-Coló JA; Fernández-del Castillo C; Salas-Ceniceros S; Rodríguez-Argüelles J; Espinosa-delos Reyes VM Gac Med Mex; 1997; 133(5):413-30. PubMed ID: 9504070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Forceps compared with vacuum: rates of neonatal and maternal morbidity. Lurie S; Sadan O; Golan A Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):426-7; author reply 427. PubMed ID: 16449136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects of assisted labor on the fetal vascular system. IV. Comparative observation between the use of obstetrical forceps and obstetrical vacuum extraction]. Neme B; Fermann D; Salomão AJ; Fraga E Matern Infanc (Sao Paulo); 1972; 31(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 5049150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Obstetrical forceps in the "Concepcion Palacios" maternity 1947-56 (5,949 cases of cephalic presentation)]. Orta SN Rev Obstet Ginecol Venez; 1969; 29(1):15-50. PubMed ID: 5385571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Place of forceps use in current obstetrical practice. (Report of 2,780 consecutive confinements)]. Silberberg L; Dufermont H; Vitse M Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1969 Sep; 64(9):475-80. PubMed ID: 5407985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Immediate materno-fetal morbidity in the use of forceps. Comparative study of divergent and crossed forceps]. Walss Rodríguez RJ; Casillas Cantú A Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1984 May; 52(325):121-5. PubMed ID: 6489800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Anatomopathological findings in cerebral injury due to obstetrical forceps]. SCHEIDEGGER S Schweiz Arch Neurol Psychiatr; 1950; 65(1-2):400-7. PubMed ID: 15431001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rotational forceps in midforceps delivery. Dyack C Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jul; 56(1):123-6. PubMed ID: 7383477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Condition of children born by the Shute's parallel forceps]. Vinsová N; Bendl J; Trnka V; Soukup K; Rothová N; Pĕtová J Cesk Gynekol; 1972 Jun; 37(6):381-2. PubMed ID: 5051686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]