These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5045259)

  • 1. Comment on "intracochlear potential recorded with micropipets. 3. Relation of cochlear microphonic potential to stapes velocity".
    Price GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1972 Jun; 51(6):2059-61. PubMed ID: 5045259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intracochlear potential recorded with micropipets. 3. Relation of cochlear microphonic potential to stapes velocity.
    Weiss TF; Peake WT; Sohmer HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Aug; 50(2):602-15. PubMed ID: 5096499
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the derivative relationship between stapes movement and cochlear microphonic.
    Dallos P; Durrant JD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1972 Oct; 52(4):1263-5. PubMed ID: 4638041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sheep as a large animal ear model: Middle-ear ossicular velocities and intracochlear sound pressure.
    Péus D; Dobrev I; Prochazka L; Thoele K; Dalbert A; Boss A; Newcomb N; Probst R; Röösli C; Sim JH; Huber A; Pfiffner F
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():88-97. PubMed ID: 28601531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intracochlear potential recorded with micropipets. I. Correlations with micropipet location.
    Sohmer HS; Peake WT; Weiss TF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Aug; 50(2):572-86. PubMed ID: 5096497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phase relations between the microphonic crista effect of the three semi-circular canals, the cochlear microphonics and the motion of the stapes.
    DE VRIES H; VROLIJK JM
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1953 Feb; 43(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 13040005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intracochlear potential recorded with micropipets. II. Responses in the cochlear scalae to tones.
    Weiss TF; Peake WT; Sohmer HS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Aug; 50(2):587-601. PubMed ID: 5096498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level, low frequency sounds.
    Greene NT; Jenkins HA; Tollin DJ; Easter JR
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():16-30. PubMed ID: 28189837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sound pressures in the basal turn of the cat cochlea.
    Nedzelnitsky V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1676-89. PubMed ID: 7462467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea.
    Ruggero MA; Rich NC; Robles L; Shivapuja BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1612-29. PubMed ID: 2341666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Middle ear muscle effects on cochlear responses to bone-conducted sound.
    Irvine DR; Wester KG
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1974 Aug; 91(4):482-96. PubMed ID: 4432760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mechanical transient distortions in the sound transmission system of the ear].
    Lerche E
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1970; 197(3):278-94. PubMed ID: 5501642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear pathology following stapes stimulation.
    Hardcastle B; McGee TM
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1969 Aug; 78(4):893-905. PubMed ID: 4979121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Permanent intracochlear electrodes in cats, tissue tolerance and cochlear microphonics.
    Simmons FB
    Laryngoscope; 1967 Feb; 77(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 6018791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Vibration properties of the ossicle and cochlea and their importance for our hearing system].
    Huber AM; Eiber A
    HNO; 2011 Mar; 59(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 21424363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of static force on round window stimulation with the direct acoustic cochlea stimulator.
    Maier H; Salcher R; Schwab B; Lenarz T
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():115-24. PubMed ID: 23276731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Acoustic impedence of various stapedial prostheses. Electrophysiological research in cats].
    Mozzo W
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1968 Mar; 44(5):398-400. PubMed ID: 5674617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [New technic for derivation of cochlear potentials of animals].
    Tereshchuk TI; Pudov AI
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1981 May; 67(5):772-5. PubMed ID: 7286313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The function of reconstructed tympanic membranes in cats.
    Tonndorf J; Khanna SM; Greenfield EC
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1971 Dec; 80(6):861-70. PubMed ID: 5127756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The cochlear geometry as a frequency analyser.
    Naftalin L
    J Laryngol Otol; 1967 Jun; 81(6):619-31. PubMed ID: 6027267
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.