These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5045426)

  • 1. Development of spurious contours of spherical and cylindrical objects in tomography.
    Reichmann S
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1972 May; 12(3):317-34. PubMed ID: 5045426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Image distortion in rotational panoramic radiography. VI. Distortion effects in sliding systems.
    Tronje G; Welander U; McDavid WD; Morris CR
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1982; 23(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 7090853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A model for the radiologic process.
    Blesser B; Ozonoff D
    Radiology; 1972 Jun; 103(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 5022946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Linear spatial frequency filtering for enhancement of radiographic images.
    Ziskin MC; Shea FJ
    Radiology; 1972 Apr; 103(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 5015807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Technique of image enhancement].
    Kühl W
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972; ():Suppl:134-5. PubMed ID: 4341168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting the measurement of size and CT number in computed tomography.
    Baxter BS; Sorenson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 7275548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction for scattered radiation in a ring detector positron camera by integral transformation of the projections.
    Bergström M; Eriksson L; Bohm C; Blomqvist G; Litton J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1983 Feb; 7(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 6600755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Image enhancement and fluoroscopy].
    Stieve FE
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972; ():Suppl:135-6. PubMed ID: 4341169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Physical basis of image enhancement].
    Röhler R
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972; ():Suppl:134. PubMed ID: 4341167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Theoretical considerations of effects of x-ray film-screen characteristics on threshold detectability of small low-contrast objects.
    Lassen M; Bloch P
    Med Phys; 1978; 5(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 683154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality.
    Rossmann K
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1969 Dec; 7(3):419-33. PubMed ID: 5382257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image intensifiers and fluoroscopy stabilizers.
    Airth GR
    Br J Radiol; 1972 Aug; 45(536):627. PubMed ID: 5045984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feasibilities of interferometric and chromascopic techniques in study of phase singularities.
    Angelsky OV; Hanson SG; Maksimyak AP; Maksimyak PP
    Appl Opt; 2005 Aug; 44(24):5091-100. PubMed ID: 16121794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical picture and diagnosis based on integrated images. Rational approach and medical results].
    Marano P
    Radiol Med; 1985 Mar; 71(3):105-9. PubMed ID: 3898239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Geodesic deformable models for medical image analysis.
    Niessen WJ; ter Haar Romeny BM; Viergever MA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Aug; 17(4):634-41. PubMed ID: 9845318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Problems of beam size control with small image intensifiers.
    Scheele RV; Hunter JG; Teates CD
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1972 Apr; 114(4):837-9. PubMed ID: 5026250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantification of the depth effect of tomographic and section imaging devices.
    Muehllehner G; Hashmi Z
    Phys Med Biol; 1972 Mar; 17(2):251-60. PubMed ID: 5072550
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Indication and technic of the 70 mm image intensification in urologic diagnosis].
    Seifert J
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Nuklearmed; 1972; ():Suppl:127-8. PubMed ID: 4344518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast formation in fluoroscopic videodensitometry. II. A comparison between theoretically computed and experimentally measured contrast.
    Lantz B; Strid KG
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1973 Nov; 14(6):625-37. PubMed ID: 4774993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A multiple-film technique for contrast enhancement and-or reduction of patient exposure.
    Miller ER
    Radiology; 1974 Feb; 110(2):361-4. PubMed ID: 4810150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.