These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 504619)
1. Mammography in the Edinburgh breast screening project. Milne L Radiography; 1979 Aug; 45(536):176-8. PubMed ID: 504619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast screening in older women. Nattress K Prof Nurse; 1999 Dec; 15(3):151. PubMed ID: 10765321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mortality reduction by breast-cancer screening. Gøtzsche PC Lancet; 2003 Jul; 362(9379):246. PubMed ID: 12885494 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Recommendations of the French Society of Mammography and Breast Pathology on quality criteria in mass screening for breast cancer in France]. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Oct; 89(10):510-1. PubMed ID: 7817080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer. D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Guildford Breast Screening Project. Pearce P Radiography; 1982 Feb; 48(566):39-43. PubMed ID: 7079475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammogram debate flares up: Latest breast cancer screening study fuels controversy. Printz C Cancer; 2014 Jun; 120(12):1755-6. PubMed ID: 24895263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of breast cancer. Mammography should be available. Querci della Rovere G; Warren R BMJ; 2001 Mar; 322(7289):792-3. PubMed ID: 11282873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of imaging in breast cancer detection. Giurescu ME; Hu T; Obembe O AAOHN J; 2010 Apr; 58(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 20415340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening mammography for women aged 40-49: are we off the fence yet? Barton MB CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 11233871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The UK breast-screening programme should start at age 47 years. Sasieni P; Cuzick J Lancet; 2003 Jul; 362(9379):246-7. PubMed ID: 12885493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The significance of MDR (mammo digital-radiography) in breast cancer mass screening]. Kido C Gan No Rinsho; 1989 May; Spec No():220-6. PubMed ID: 2689663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biology and cost-benefit in mammography screening. Rutqvist LE Acta Oncol; 1997; 36(7):673-4. PubMed ID: 9490081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mammography: American recommendations overhauled]. Hoeffken W MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1981 May; 123(18):722-4. PubMed ID: 6785617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Decrease in breast cancer mortality due to mass screening with mammography; results of the Nijmegen mass screening project 1975-1981]. Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Mravunac M; Sturmans F; Day NE Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1985 Mar; 129(10):451-4. PubMed ID: 3982520 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quality control of mammography]. Endo T Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():324-7. PubMed ID: 17682173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A mobile breast screening project in Scotland: lessons learned for national screening. Haiart DC; Henderson J; McKenzie L; Kirkpatrick AE Int J Health Plann Manage; 1990; 5(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 10107481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Current status of screening digital mammography in Japan]. Yamada T; Suzuki A Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():318-23. PubMed ID: 17679206 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Tomosynthesis combined with mammography detects more breast cancers than mammography alone]. Scherz N Praxis (Bern 1994); 2014 Oct; 103(20):1213-4. PubMed ID: 25270753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]