175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 504619)
1. Mammography in the Edinburgh breast screening project.
Milne L
Radiography; 1979 Aug; 45(536):176-8. PubMed ID: 504619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Breast screening in older women.
Nattress K
Prof Nurse; 1999 Dec; 15(3):151. PubMed ID: 10765321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mortality reduction by breast-cancer screening.
Gøtzsche PC
Lancet; 2003 Jul; 362(9379):246. PubMed ID: 12885494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Recommendations of the French Society of Mammography and Breast Pathology on quality criteria in mass screening for breast cancer in France].
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1994 Oct; 89(10):510-1. PubMed ID: 7817080
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. On the frontline of screening for breast cancer.
D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
Semin Oncol; 2011 Feb; 38(1):119-27. PubMed ID: 21362520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Guildford Breast Screening Project.
Pearce P
Radiography; 1982 Feb; 48(566):39-43. PubMed ID: 7079475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammogram debate flares up: Latest breast cancer screening study fuels controversy.
Printz C
Cancer; 2014 Jun; 120(12):1755-6. PubMed ID: 24895263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of breast cancer. Mammography should be available.
Querci della Rovere G; Warren R
BMJ; 2001 Mar; 322(7289):792-3. PubMed ID: 11282873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Role of imaging in breast cancer detection.
Giurescu ME; Hu T; Obembe O
AAOHN J; 2010 Apr; 58(4):131-4. PubMed ID: 20415340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Screening mammography for women aged 40-49: are we off the fence yet?
Barton MB
CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):498-9. PubMed ID: 11233871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The UK breast-screening programme should start at age 47 years.
Sasieni P; Cuzick J
Lancet; 2003 Jul; 362(9379):246-7. PubMed ID: 12885493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [The significance of MDR (mammo digital-radiography) in breast cancer mass screening].
Kido C
Gan No Rinsho; 1989 May; Spec No():220-6. PubMed ID: 2689663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biology and cost-benefit in mammography screening.
Rutqvist LE
Acta Oncol; 1997; 36(7):673-4. PubMed ID: 9490081
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Mammography: American recommendations overhauled].
Hoeffken W
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1981 May; 123(18):722-4. PubMed ID: 6785617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography: consensus in sight?
Saul H
Eur J Cancer; 2002 May; 38(8):1035. PubMed ID: 12109411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Decrease in breast cancer mortality due to mass screening with mammography; results of the Nijmegen mass screening project 1975-1981].
Verbeek AL; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Mravunac M; Sturmans F; Day NE
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1985 Mar; 129(10):451-4. PubMed ID: 3982520
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Quality control of mammography].
Endo T
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():324-7. PubMed ID: 17682173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A mobile breast screening project in Scotland: lessons learned for national screening.
Haiart DC; Henderson J; McKenzie L; Kirkpatrick AE
Int J Health Plann Manage; 1990; 5(3):201-13. PubMed ID: 10107481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Current status of screening digital mammography in Japan].
Yamada T; Suzuki A
Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun; 65 Suppl 6():318-23. PubMed ID: 17679206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Tomosynthesis combined with mammography detects more breast cancers than mammography alone].
Scherz N
Praxis (Bern 1994); 2014 Oct; 103(20):1213-4. PubMed ID: 25270753
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
