BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 504635)

  • 1. Prognostic factors of breast neoplasms detected on screening by mammography and physical examination.
    Feig SA; Schwartz GF; Nerlinger R; Edeiken J
    Radiology; 1979 Dec; 133(3 Pt 1):577-82. PubMed ID: 504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The comparative value of mammographic screening for women 40-49 years old versus women 50-64 years old.
    Curpen BN; Sickles EA; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB; Frankel SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1099-103. PubMed ID: 7717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pathologic discriminants of breast cancers detected on screening by mammography and physical examination.
    Feig SA; Schwartz GF
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):579-88. PubMed ID: 7349824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advantages and limitations of physical examination and mammography in breast cancer screening.
    Feig SA; Schwartz GF
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1981; 4(1-4):553-63. PubMed ID: 7349821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial versus subsequent screening mammography: comparison of findings and their prognostic significance.
    Frankel SD; Sickles EA; Curpen BN; Sollitto RA; Ominsky SH; Galvin HB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 May; 164(5):1107-9. PubMed ID: 7717214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors.
    Feig SA; Shaber GS; Patchefsky A; Schwartz GF; Edeiken J; Libshitz HI; Nerlinger R; Curley RF; Wallace JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Mar; 128(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 190908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast carcinoma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis before and after the introduction of mass mammographic screening.
    Ernst MF; Voogd AC; Coebergh JW; Roukema JA
    Cancer; 2004 Apr; 100(7):1337-44. PubMed ID: 15042665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer survival rates with mammographic screening: similar favorable survival rates for women younger and those older than 50 years.
    Thurfjell EL; Lindgren JA
    Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):421-6. PubMed ID: 8888234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thermography, mammography, and clinical examination in breast cancer screening. Review of 16,000 studies.
    Feig SA; Shaber GS; Schwartz GF; Patchefsky A; Libshitz HI; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R; Curley RF; Wallace JD
    Radiology; 1977 Jan; 122(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 830320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.
    Burrell HC; Sibbering DM; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Evans AJ; Yeoman LJ; Elston CW; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Robertson JF
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):811-7. PubMed ID: 8638010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relative diagnostic impact of screening mammography and physical examination.
    Taves DH; McCurdy LI; Sparrow RK
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Aug; 47(4):257-9. PubMed ID: 8696991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of breast cancer in an incident cancer population.
    Schmitt EL; Threatt B
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Aug; 143(2):403-6. PubMed ID: 6611076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mammographic screening in the county of Copenhagen. Clinical consequences of the first three screening rounds].
    Tange UB; Hirsch FR; Jensen MB; Olsen AH; Blichert-Toft M; Rank FE; Vejborg IM; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Feb; 164(8):1036-40. PubMed ID: 11894704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
    Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Survival of women ages 40-49 years with breast carcinoma according to method of detection.
    McPherson CP; Swenson KK; Jolitz G; Murray CL
    Cancer; 1997 May; 79(10):1923-32. PubMed ID: 9149019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Screening for breast cancer (author's transl)].
    De Waard F; Rombach JJ; Collette HJ
    Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1981; 51(8):685-9. PubMed ID: 7340714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Systematic mammographic screening for breast cancer in asymptomatic women].
    Bourdon C; Mazy G; Vandenbroucke A
    J Belge Radiol; 1992 Feb; 75(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 1568999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of mammography for detecting early breast cancer in women under 50.
    Yokoe T; Iino Y; Maemura M; Takei H; Horiguchi J; Matsumoto H; Morishita Y; Koibuchi Y
    Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(6B):4709-11. PubMed ID: 9891545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Screening mammography reduces morbidity of breast cancer treatment.
    Leung JW
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 May; 184(5):1508-9. PubMed ID: 15855106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mammography: a critical evaluation of its role in breast cancer screening, especially in developing countries.
    Miller AB
    J Public Health Policy; 1989; 10(4):486-98. PubMed ID: 2621252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.