137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5046439)
1. Nuclear power and public health.
Wolff AH
Am J Public Health; 1972 Aug; 62(8):1042-3. PubMed ID: 5046439
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Review of health physics research administered by U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Moeller DW
Health Phys; 1978 Sep; 35(3):447-56. PubMed ID: 748242
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Nuclear energy and the environment.
Doran WT; Burr WW; Bibb WR
J Occup Med; 1971 Oct; 13(10):479-83. PubMed ID: 5120706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Nuclear competition and its repercussions on the norms applicable to reactors in the United States].
Hubert EH
J Belge Radiol; 1974; 57(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 4600440
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The new health and safety act as it relates to occupational radiation exposure.
Ryer FH
Health Phys; 1975 Jul; 29(1):207-12. PubMed ID: 1150457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Power needs and power problems--past, present and future.
Thompson TJ
Am J Public Health; 1971 Jul; 61(7):1406-15. PubMed ID: 5563258
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Invited comments on "A derivation of the 'Factor of 700' for 131 I".
Hull AP; George KD
Health Phys; 1970 Nov; 19(5):698-9. PubMed ID: 5537949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiation exposure and the protection of the community.
Gloag D
Br Med J; 1980 Dec; 281(6254):1545-8. PubMed ID: 7437872
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Atomic Energy Commission and the politics of radiation protection, 1967-1971.
Walker JS
Isis; 1994 Mar; 85(1):57-78. PubMed ID: 8194960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Nuclear safety: damaged fuel ignites a new debate in AEC.
Gillette R
Science; 1972 Jul; 177(4046):330-1. PubMed ID: 5035481
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Nuclear reactor safety: a new dilemma for the AEC.
Gillette R
Science; 1971 Jul; 173(3992):126-30. PubMed ID: 5581905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Nuclear plants: hygienic aspects and protection of the population].
Tagliaferri V; Tarsitani G
Nuovi Ann Ig Microbiol; 1983; 34(5):387-419. PubMed ID: 6396584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Human costs of nuclear power.
Sagan LA
Science; 1972 Aug; 177(4048):487-93. PubMed ID: 5050480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nuclear power: psychology and statistics.
Annas GJ
Am J Public Health; 1983 Nov; 73(11):1327-8. PubMed ID: 6625043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. ICRP rules row.
Dickson D
Nature; 1980 Jun; 285(5764):350. PubMed ID: 7383155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. New look at basic radiation standards.
Snow DL
Am J Public Health; 1971 Nov; 61(11):2294-9. PubMed ID: 5112978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Environmental levels of radioactivity at Atomic Energy Commission installations.
Radiol Health Data Rep; 1971 Apr; 12(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 5109522
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Criteria for a recommended standard. Occupational exposure to beryllium and its compounds.
Utidjian HM
J Occup Med; 1973 Aug; 15(8):659-62. PubMed ID: 4516518
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. United States nuclear industry perspective on useful improvements to radiation protection principles.
Andersen RL
Health Phys; 2004 Sep; 87(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 15303064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The safety goals of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Okrent D
Science; 1987 Apr; 236(4799):296-300. PubMed ID: 3563510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
