These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5046526)
41. Split-dose recovery in euoxic and hypoxic normal and tumor cells. Phillips TL Radiology; 1972 Oct; 105(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 5057293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. An estimation of changes in the proportions and absolute numbers of hypoxic cells after irradiation of transplanted C3H mousemammary tumours. Howes AE Br J Radiol; 1969 Jun; 42(498):441-7. PubMed ID: 5810856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Effects of continuous irradiation at low dose-rates on a rat rhabdomyosarcoma. Kal HB; Barendsen GW Br J Radiol; 1972 Apr; 45(532):279-83. PubMed ID: 5017719 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Is hyperbaric oxygen more effective than carbogen/nicotinamide in tumor radiation response? Hartmann KA; Van der Kleij AJ; Schneider CJ; Sminia P Radiat Res; 1997 Nov; 148(5):523-5. PubMed ID: 9355875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Normal tissue damage and tumor cure probability for irradiation given under different conditions of tissue oxygenation in hybrid mice. Suit H; Howard TC Radiology; 1967 Oct; 89(4):720-6. PubMed ID: 6059612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. The implications of radiobiology for radiotherapists. Thomlinson RH Clin Radiol; 1974 Oct; 25(4):471-4. PubMed ID: 4442240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Comment: radiosensitization and the selective effect. Rubin P JAMA; 1971 Aug; 217(7):952-3. PubMed ID: 5109363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. On the relative importance of hypoxic cells for the radiotherapy of human tumours. Kaplan HS Eur J Cancer (1965); 1974 May; 10(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 4216482 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. DEMONSTRATION OF AN ANOXIC COMPONENT IN A MOUSE TUMOR-CELL POPULATION BY IN VIVO ASSAY OF SURVIVAL FOLLOWING IRRADIATION. POWERS WE; TOLMACH LJ Radiology; 1964 Aug; 83():328-36. PubMed ID: 14207425 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Hypothesis. Elkind recovery and "sub-lethal damage": a misleading association? Alper T Br J Radiol; 1977 Jul; 50(595):459-67. PubMed ID: 326328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. The effect of single and fractionated doses of x rays on the effective proportion of hypoxic cells in C 3 H mouse mammary tumours. Howes AE; Page A; Fowler JF Br J Radiol; 1972 Apr; 45(532):250-6. PubMed ID: 5017715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. RADIOBIOLOGICAL BASIS OF RADIATION THERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER. ZANCA P Med Times; 1964 Sep; 92():900-7. PubMed ID: 14178878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Quantitative and qualitative aspects of radiobiology and their significance in radiation therapy. Wideröe R Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1971 Dec; 10(6):605-24. PubMed ID: 5004702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. The eighteenth Douglas Lea lecture. 40 years of radiobiology: its impact on radiotherapy. Fowler JF Phys Med Biol; 1984 Feb; 29(2):97-113. PubMed ID: 6422482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The potential for improving radiotherapy outcome by improving the oxygen supply to solid tumours. Denekamp J; Waites A Strahlenther Onkol; 1996 Nov; 172 Suppl 2():22-3. PubMed ID: 8946041 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Redistribution and reoxygenation in a C 3 H mouse mammary carcinoma. Gillette EL; Suit HD; Marshall N Radiat Res; 1972 Jun; 50(3):574-82. PubMed ID: 5030085 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]