BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5049157)

  • 1. Evaluation of the effectiveness of cytologic screening for cervical cancer. I. Incidence and mortality trends in relation to screening.
    Dickinson L; Mussey ME; Soule EH; Kurland LT
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1972 Aug; 47(8):534-44. PubMed ID: 5049157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the effectiveness of cytologic screening for cervical cancer. II. Survival parameters before and after inception of screening.
    Dickinson L; Mussey ME; Kurland LT
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1972 Aug; 47(8):545-9. PubMed ID: 5049158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the effectiveness of cytologic screening for cervical cancer. 3. Cost-benefit analysis.
    Dickinson L
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1972 Aug; 47(8):550-5. PubMed ID: 5049159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Control of cancer of the uterine cervix by cytologic screening.
    Dickinson LE
    Gynecol Oncol; 1975 Mar; 3(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 1150120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Incidence and mortality of uterine cervix cancer in Norway. When do we get organized nation-wide cytologic screening in Norway?].
    Magnus K; Langmark F
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 May; 110(12):1557-9. PubMed ID: 2187277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical cancer in New Zealand: national and regional trends.
    Cox B; Borman B
    N Z Med J; 1994 Aug; 107(984):323-6. PubMed ID: 8072727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Incidence of cervical cancer 5 years after mass screening in the community of Medvesćak].
    Juras N; Tućan V; Pirkić A; Sućur A
    Acta Med Iugosl; 1984; 38(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 6496168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Walton report and its subsequent impact on cervical cancer screening programs in Canada.
    Worth AJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 6694805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improved prognosis for cervical cancers due to comprehensive screening.
    Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
    Acta Cytol; 1972; 16(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 4501868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
    Sachs H; Hasche C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening for cervical neoplasia. A survey of the assumptions from studies on the screening in Maribo Amt.
    Berget A
    Dan Med Bull; 1979 Nov; 26(7):313-32. PubMed ID: 118850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Report on a three-county cervical cancer screening project.
    Whitlock NH; Long SE; Kuemmerer JM
    J S C Med Assoc; 1972 Jun; 68(6):237-46. PubMed ID: 4504050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cervical cancer screening program.
    Landrum JM; Schoenbucher AK
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1971 Oct; 60(10):339-41. PubMed ID: 5118318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
    Wain GV; Hacker NF
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Systematic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix (epidemiologic aspects)].
    Campion J; Flamant R
    Bull Inst Natl Sante Rech Med; 1966; 21(5):977-94. PubMed ID: 5976404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Value of cytologic and gynecology screening tests].
    Sachs H
    Fortschr Med; 1974 Sep; 92(26):1037-41. PubMed ID: 4606060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The natural history of Pap test screening in a rural population.
    Rosenfeld JA
    Tenn Med; 1998 May; 91(5):179-82. PubMed ID: 9584605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An assessment of the effectiveness of cervical cytology screening in Sheffield.
    Johnson IS; Milner PC; Todd JN
    Community Med; 1987 May; 9(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 3608418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.