These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5056722)
1. Principles of family planning for Roman Catholics. Hemingway L Med J Aust; 1972 Mar; 1(11):550. PubMed ID: 5056722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Principles of family planning for Roman Catholics. Carey HM Med J Aust; 1972 May; 1(20):1057. PubMed ID: 5056310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Principles of family planning for Roman Catholics. Hemingway L Med J Aust; 1972 Jan; 1(2):90. PubMed ID: 5025174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Principles of family planning for Roman Catholics. Carey HM Med J Aust; 1972 Feb; 1(7):366. PubMed ID: 5024872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Principles of family planning for Roman Catholics. Hemingway L Med J Aust; 1972 Jul; 2(5):285. PubMed ID: 5076015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Principles of family planning for Roman Catholics. Hemingway L Med J Aust; 1972 Jun; 1(24):1274. PubMed ID: 5038919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Principles of family planning for Roman Catholics. Carey HM Med J Aust; 1971 Dec; 2(25):1301-3. PubMed ID: 5134730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. FERTILITY DIFFERENTIALS AMONG CATHOLICS IN AUSTRALIA. DAY LH Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1964 Apr; 42():57-83. PubMed ID: 14136994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade. Reality check. Segers MC Conscience; 1998; 18(4):37-8. PubMed ID: 12178890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ethical dilemmas in population policy. Shannon TA Conscience; 1986; 7(2):1, 3. PubMed ID: 12178935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural family planning: very risky business. Hughes J Conscience; 1988; 9(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 12178833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Man's limitations. The Catholic view. Bacani T Asiaweek; 1993 Oct; ():52. PubMed ID: 12345271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Homologous artificial insemination (AIH) and gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT) in Roman Catholicism and Halakhic Judaism. Grazi RV; Wolowelsky JB Int J Fertil; 1993; 38(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 8097502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Roe v. Wade. Ardently prochoice. Baldwin M Conscience; 1998; 18(4):15-6. PubMed ID: 12178875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Catholics and abortion: authority vs. dissent. Ruether RR Conscience; 1985; 6(6):9-11. PubMed ID: 12178934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion: articulating a moral view. Kissling F Conscience; 2000; 21(2):21-2, 27. PubMed ID: 12178926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The rhythm is off beat: a personal view of Catholic teachings on contraception. Danguilan MJ Women Action; 1994; (4):13-6. PubMed ID: 12348981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Roe v. Wade. Reflective compassion. Padovano AT Conscience; 1998; 18(4):32-3. PubMed ID: 12178887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. To make a seamless garment, use a single piece of cloth. Gudorf CE Conscience; 1996; 17(3):10-21. PubMed ID: 12178867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]