These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5065455)

  • 1. Intelligibility of time-compressed CNC monosyllables.
    Beasley DS; Schwimmer S; Rintelmann WF
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Jun; 15(2):340-50. PubMed ID: 5065455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of noise-induced hearing-impaired listeners on time-compressed consonant-nucleus-consonant monosyllables.
    Kurdziel SA; Rintelmann WF; Beasley DS
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(2):54-60. PubMed ID: 1232075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of simultaneous dichotic and monotic monosyllables.
    Lowe SS; Cullen JK; Berlin CI; Thompson CL; Willett ME
    J Speech Hear Res; 1970 Dec; 13(4):812-22. PubMed ID: 5491355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intelligibility of distorted speech sounds shifted in frequency and time in normal children.
    Nagafuchi M
    Audiology; 1976; 15(4):326-37. PubMed ID: 1275817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variables influencing performance on speech-sound discrimination tests.
    Schwartz AH; Goldman R
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Mar; 17(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 4828359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality judgments of hearing aid transduced speech.
    Witter HL; Goldstein DP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):312-22. PubMed ID: 5558085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Expansion and the intelligibility of speech by blind and sighted, nonretarded and retarded individuals.
    Flowers DM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1974 Mar; 78(5):619-24. PubMed ID: 4820211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting speech discrimination test difficulty.
    Kreul EJ; Bell DW; Nixon JC
    J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Jun; 12(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 5808854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech discrimination in noise.
    Cooper JC; Cutts BP
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):332-7. PubMed ID: 5558087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intelligibility of connected discourse.
    Speaks C; Parker B; Harris C; Kuhl P
    J Speech Hear Res; 1972 Sep; 15(3):590-602. PubMed ID: 5080052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hearing aid distortion and consonant identification.
    Bode DL; Kasten RN
    J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Jun; 14(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 5558086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sound discrimination ability of children with misarticulation of the r-sound.
    Wolfe VI; Irwin RB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Oct; 37(2):415-20. PubMed ID: 4747357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory analysis of temporally distorted sentential approximations.
    Beasley DS; Shriner TH
    Audiology; 1973; 12(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 4722025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of speech intelligibility in short-reverberant sound fields.
    Shimokura R; Matsui T; Takaki Y; Nishimura T; Yamanaka T; Hosoi H
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2014 Aug; 41(4):343-9. PubMed ID: 24560785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of the duration of a silent interval in nonspeech stimuli: a test of the motor theory of speech perception.
    Baumrin JM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Jun; 17(2):294-309. PubMed ID: 4836047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Brief storage of compressed digits.
    Holding DH; Foulke E; Heise RL
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 4759637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Averaged encephalic response of aphasics to linguistic and nonlinguistic auditory stimuli.
    Greenberg HJ; Metting PJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Mar; 17(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 4364036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6: normative and comparative intelligibility functions.
    Wilson RH; Coley KE; Haenel JL; Browning KM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(5):221-8. PubMed ID: 956010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Acoustic and phoniatric investigations in esophageal speech (author's transl)].
    Sáfrán A; Orawetz O; Martikány I
    HNO; 1977 Apr; 25(4):137-9. PubMed ID: 863756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of massed practice on the comprehension of time-compressed speech.
    Orr DB; Friedman HL
    J Educ Psychol; 1968 Feb; 59(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 5645213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.