These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Ear asymmetry and delayed auditory feedback: effects of task requirements and competitive stimulation. Bradshaw JL; Nettleton NC; Geffen G J Exp Psychol; 1972 Aug; 94(3):269-75. PubMed ID: 5044276 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The relative contribution of visual and auditory components of speech to speech intelligibility as a function of three conditions of frequency distortion. Sanders DA; Goodrich SJ J Speech Hear Res; 1971 Mar; 14(1):154-9. PubMed ID: 5550619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Shifting attention between the ears. Treisman AM Q J Exp Psychol; 1971 May; 23(2):157-67. PubMed ID: 5559704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Investigations on the intelligibleness of a new record of the German Freiburg speech discrimination test]. Plath P; Stühlen HW; Graf H; Pelzer H Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Jun; 52(6):457-69. PubMed ID: 4734046 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The pretherapy speech intelligibility of a glossectomee. Riviere CL; Seilo MT; Dimmick KC J Commun Disord; 1974 Dec; 7(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 4443444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Children's perception of time-compressed speech on two measures of speech discrimination. Beasley DS; Maki JE; Orchik DJ J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 May; 41(2):216-25. PubMed ID: 1271782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Speech-sound discrimination skills as measured by reaction time for normal and articulatory defective speaking children. Weiner FF; Falk ML Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Apr; 34(2):595-600. PubMed ID: 5021811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Intelligibility of time-altered speech in relation to chronological aging. Konkle DF; Beasley DS; Bess FH J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Mar; 20(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 846194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility. Dirks DD; Bower D J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Apr; 47(4):1003-8. PubMed ID: 5443146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. An investigation of speaker photograph indentification. Lass NJ; Harvey LA J Acoust Soc Am; 1976 May; 59(5):1232-6. PubMed ID: 956519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The difficulty of listening to time-compressed speech. Zemlin WR; Daniloff RG; Shriner TH J Speech Hear Res; 1968 Dec; 11(4):875-81. PubMed ID: 5719245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Multidimensional analysis of choice reaction time judgments on pairs of English fricatives. Weiner FF; Singh S J Exp Psychol; 1974 Apr; 102(4):615-20. PubMed ID: 4855492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Identification versus discrimination of distinctive features in speech perception. Blumstein S; Cooper W Q J Exp Psychol; 1972 May; 24(2):207-14. PubMed ID: 5043117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The neural basis of sublexical speech and corresponding nonspeech processing: a combined EEG-MEG study. Kuuluvainen S; Nevalainen P; Sorokin A; Mittag M; Partanen E; Putkinen V; Seppänen M; Kähkönen S; Kujala T Brain Lang; 2014 Mar; 130():19-32. PubMed ID: 24576806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Decoding four different sound-categories in the auditory cortex using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Hong KS; Santosa H Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():157-166. PubMed ID: 26828741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]