These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5068273)

  • 1. Drug antisubstitution laws: reprise.
    JAMA; 1972 Aug; 221(7):711. PubMed ID: 5068273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joint statement on antisubstitution laws and regulations.
    JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(2):142. PubMed ID: 4740275
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Editorial: Drug antisubstitution laws: further comment.
    Hussey HH
    JAMA; 1975 Apr; 232(4):381. PubMed ID: 1173134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drug antisubstitution laws.
    Briganti FJ
    JAMA; 1972 Oct; 222(5):583. PubMed ID: 4678100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On therapeutic equivalency and the antisubstitution laws.
    Schiffman DO
    JAMA; 1973 Jan; 223(5):552-3. PubMed ID: 4739142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Antisubstitution laws.
    JAMA; 1973 Oct; 226(2):200-1. PubMed ID: 4740924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The model drug product selection statute: a blueprint for more effective state laws.
    McCarey MC
    Am Pharm; 1979 Feb; 19(2):38-9. PubMed ID: 760469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Letter: Antisubstitution laws.
    Herbert RJ
    JAMA; 1973 Nov; 226(8):1012. PubMed ID: 4800329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prescriptions enter the political arena.
    Regier H
    J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 4546224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New York's generic drug substitution law.
    Kamen A
    N Y State Dent J; 1980 Nov; 46(9):599-604. PubMed ID: 6935574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antisubstitution law controversy--a solution?
    Strom BL; Stolley PD; Brown TC
    Ann Intern Med; 1974 Aug; 81(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 4846108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dear DEA.
    Heit HA; Covington E; Good PM
    Pain Med; 2004 Sep; 5(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 15367311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic issues in the antisubstitution controversy.
    Sharpe TR
    Am J Pharm Sci Support Public Health; 1977; 149(2):53-9. PubMed ID: 910879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Forces and direction of drug product selection legislation.
    Stewart JE
    Med Mark Media; 1979 Jun; 14(6):34-6, 38-9. PubMed ID: 10242281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generic drug equivalents: opening Pandora's Rx.
    Regulation; 1979; 3(3):4-5. PubMed ID: 10242344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Court files order in pharmacies' case against FDA.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Oct; 229(8):1228. PubMed ID: 17066572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Letter: Antisubstitution vs. cooperative substitution.
    Jones ME; Helling DK; Widmer RB
    Am Fam Physician; 1976 Jul; 14(1):27. PubMed ID: 937160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient consent in drug substitution laws.
    Archambault GF
    Hosp Formul; 1975 Nov; 10(11):558. PubMed ID: 10237821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nevada law aims to halt drug diversion by wholesalers.
    Young D
    Am J Health Syst Pharm; 2002 Jan; 59(2):103-4. PubMed ID: 11826557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prescriptions: how does the pharmacy check for plausibility?].
    Ewering I
    Hautarzt; 2015 Dec; 66(12):967-9. PubMed ID: 26471038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.