169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5068478)
1. Family planning policy development in North Carolina: weak tea.
Measham AR
Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Apr; 4(2):47-58. PubMed ID: 5068478
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Multiagency participation in family planning administration.
Allen JE; Jain SC
HSMHA Health Rep; 1971 Aug; 86(8):699-705. PubMed ID: 5115603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Family planning in 19 rural counties.
Knauff LK
Fam Plann Perspect; 1972 Jul; 4(3):13-20. PubMed ID: 5067991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic woes mean cuts to family planning services.
Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):104, 109-10. PubMed ID: 12284064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Community development and health education: I. Community organization as a health tactic.
Wise HB; Levin LS; Kurahara RT
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1968 Jul; 46(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 5695332
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Background, context and significant issues in neighborhood health center programs.
Schorr LB; English JT
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1968 Jul; 46(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 5672028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional coordination of multi-agency programs: a symposium.
Crawford RD; Bernstein GS; London GD
Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Jan; 2(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 5538027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The new federal role in education and family services: goal setting without responsibility.
Allen-Meares P
Soc Work; 1996 Sep; 41(5):533-40. PubMed ID: 8840829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Montefiore Hospital Neighborhood Medical Care Demonstration. A case study.
Wise HB
Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1968 Jul; 46(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 5695331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Lake County, Michigan. A profile of rural poverty, public health, and a plan that failed.
Gorwitz K; Dennis R
Public Health Rep; 1975; 90(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 808822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A patchwork of funding sources for Norplant users in the U.S.
Antarsh L
AVSC News; 1992 Sep; 30(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 12285829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. S.2108: Capitol Hill debates the future of population and family planning.
Lincoln R
Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Jan; 2(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 5520502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A five-year plan for population research and family planning services. 1. Overview.
Hellman LM
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Oct; 3(4):35-40. PubMed ID: 5140232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Neighborhood health centers; can they weather the drought?
Glazier WH
Hospitals; 1973 Dec; 47(23):39-42. PubMed ID: 4586736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Population policy: do we need it? Prospects and problems.
Moyo NP
Zimb J Econ; 1986 Jan; 1(3):36-40. PubMed ID: 12280448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Public welfare and family planning.
Goldman J; Kogan LS
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Oct; 3(4):19-31. PubMed ID: 5003802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What state governments can do.
Weinberg D
Fam Plann Perspect; 1970 Mar; 2(2):30-4. PubMed ID: 4938715
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The pharmacist and family planning: review and report of a study.
Smith MC; Wetherbee H; Sharpe TR
Am J Pharm; 1978; 150(5):152-9. PubMed ID: 12260649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Family planning information: do low-income families need and want it?
Brand J
J Home Econ; 1972 May; 64(5):2-5. PubMed ID: 12306250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Public funding of abortions and abortion counseling for poor women.
Edwards RB
Adv Bioeth; 1997; 2():303-34. PubMed ID: 12348330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
