These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Studies on intrauterine contraceptive devices (polyethylene ring, polyethylene-metal combined ring and rubber wing). I. Effectiveness and side-effects. Sakurabayashi M; Yoshida M; Amano K; Owada F; Nagashima T J Jpn Obstet Gynecol Soc; 1968 Oct; 15(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 5708337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Possibilities of ultrasonic diagnosis in the localization of intrauterine contraceptive devices]. Thurzó L; Gellén J Orv Hetil; 1977 Jan; 118(3):138-41. PubMed ID: 831209 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Heating of metallic intrauterine contraceptive devices during ultrasound examination. Grossman M Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jul; 52(1):110-12. PubMed ID: 683620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EXPERIENCE IN USE OF INTRAUTERINE DEVICES FOR CONTRACEPTIVE PURPOSES. NASH W N Y State J Med; 1965 Jul; 65():1872-5. PubMed ID: 14338454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Empty-bladder (hysterographic) view on US for evaluation of intrauterine devices. Work in progress. Carroll R; Gombergh R Radiology; 1987 Jun; 163(3):822-3. PubMed ID: 3554346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The detection of intra-uterine contraceptive devices by ultrasonic investigation. Smith HM; Smith WI; Edwards SJ Radiography; 1977 Mar; 43(507):60-2. PubMed ID: 847109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Insertion of intra-uterine devices. Some technical considerations: II. Goldstuck ND Practitioner; 1982 Jul; 226(1369):1319-23. PubMed ID: 7111168 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of intrauterine devices on preimplantation changes in the mouse uterus. Martin L; Finn CA J Endocrinol; 1970 Feb; 46(2):xix-xx. PubMed ID: 5492015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Studies on intrauterine contraceptive devices. IV. The position of IUD in the cavity of uterus and nidation of fertilized ova. Sakurabayashi M; Mohri T; Ono T; Takabatake H Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 1969 Oct; 16(4):275-84. PubMed ID: 5394733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of intrauterine devices on subsequent fertility. Skjeldestad FE Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 20(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 18460943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Troubles with I.U.C.D.s. Br Med J; 1973 Jun; 2(5865):551. PubMed ID: 4714490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Ultrasonic determination of the position of a coil when pregnancy has occurred]. Ulrich LG; Lynge P; Larsen J Ugeskr Laeger; 1987 Apr; 149(16):1058-9. PubMed ID: 3554687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A new intrauterine contraceptive device. An open ring. Rozin S; Adoni A Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Aug; 36(2):304-5. PubMed ID: 5428495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Progress in intrauterine contraceptive methods. 3. Evaluation of post-insertion results]. Sakurabayashi M; Nagano M Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1967 Nov; 19(11):1406-10. PubMed ID: 5627228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Progress in intrauterine contraceptive devices. I. Evaluation of our cases]. Sakurabayashi M; Nagano M Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1967 Sep; 19(9):1123-7. PubMed ID: 5625663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of ultrasounds in real time in the localization of intrauterine contraceptive devices (author's transl). Paparella P; Ciorlandino C; Gentili P; Sintoni L Acta Med Rom; 1980; 18(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 12337638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]