These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Anaphylactoid reaction following the oral administration of iodide-containing cholecystographic media. ARMEN RN; COHEN SG; KANTOR M J Allergy; 1956 Nov; 27(6):544-7. PubMed ID: 13366557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Conventional oral cholecystography versus single-visit oral cholecystography. Nathan MH; Newman A Am J Gastroenterol; 1981 Dec; 76(6):527-9. PubMed ID: 7331984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cholecystographic diagnosis of duodenal ulcer: the incomplete ring sign. Sickles EA Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 866654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Research on possible cardio-circulatory repercussions during intramuscular colangiocholecystography by means of a new hexaiodinated contrast medium]. Strozzi C; Biolcati-Rinaldi A Arch Ital Mal Appar Dig; 1968; 35(3):271-302. PubMed ID: 5733150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [Clinical and chemical aspects of residual contrast media in the intestine during oral cholecystography with Trijobil and Falignost]. Quasdorf M; Becker C; Quasdorf G; Becker HW Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1977; 18(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 866607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Trial study with a new oral cholecystographic medium: orabilex. VAN EPPS EF; BEHLKE FM J Iowa State Med Soc; 1959 Jun; 49(6):331-4. PubMed ID: 13654862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Comparative review of the results of a study of the gallbladder using contrast methods (personal experience)]. Lazić M; Marton B; Libman E Med Pregl; 1983; 36(9-10):437-40. PubMed ID: 6674733 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative evaluation of a new oral cholecystographic agent (telepaque) with priodax; a preliminary report. MARKS JL; SCHELBLE JA Wis Med J; 1952 Feb; 51(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 14901872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparative study with a closed sequential design between iopronic and iocetamic acid in oral cholecystocholangiography with radiograms in short and standard times. Laboratory evaluation of hepatic function (author's transl)]. Lutman M; Morassut S; Bigai M; Galassi G; Galofaro G; Piazza P Radiol Med; 1980; 66(7-8):517-22. PubMed ID: 6452657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Results obtained in comparative radiographie, clinical and clinical-chemical studies in iocetamic acid (DRC 1201) and iopanoic acid. Hekster RE Radiol Clin Biol; 1968; 37(6):338-52. PubMed ID: 5714064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. An evaluation of two recently introduced oral cholecystographic media. MCCORT J Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1957 Jan; 77(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 13381857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Bilivistan, a new contrast medium for I. V. cholegraphy. Egeblad M Dan Med Bull; 1966 May; 13(2):36-40. PubMed ID: 5328496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]