These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 507055)

  • 1. Medical paternalism and the rule of law: a reply to Dr. Relman.
    Baron CH
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):337-65. PubMed ID: 507055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical paternalism or legal imperialism: not the only alternatives for handling Saikewicz-type cases.
    Buchanan A
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.
    Annas GJ
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Who speaks for incompetent patients? The case of Joseph Saikewicz.
    Carroll PR
    Trustee; 1978 Dec; 31(12):19, 21-2, 24. PubMed ID: 10239592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Litigating life and death.
    Rhoden NK
    Harv Law Rev; 1988 Dec; 102(2):375-446. PubMed ID: 10294608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judicial postponement of death recognition: the tragic case of Mary O'Connor.
    Gindes D
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):301-31. PubMed ID: 2513713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Saikewicz decision: a medical viewpoint.
    Relman AS
    Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 736045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient.
    Norris JA
    Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of judges in life/death decisions for the neurologically impaired.
    Beresford HR
    Ann Neurol; 1978 Nov; 4(5):463-4. PubMed ID: 736527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. For them rather than by them.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1993; 23(6):30-1. PubMed ID: 8307744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assuring "detached but passionate investigation and decision": the role of guardians ad litem in Saikewicz-type cases.
    Baron CH
    Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(2):111-30. PubMed ID: 707492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Court's guidelines on incompetent patients compromise their rights.
    Connery JR
    Hosp Prog; 1980 Sep; 61(9):46-9. PubMed ID: 10248004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision-making with psychiatrically impaired patients. A collaborative endeavor.
    Grant R; Steel EK
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 13(1):149-56. PubMed ID: 2179904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient.
    Brennan TA
    Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):204-9. PubMed ID: 3205051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ironies and tensions in feeding the dying.
    Capron AM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Oct; 14(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 6438020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience.
    Thomson CJ
    Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Saikewicz precedent: what's good for an incompetent patient?
    Ramsey P
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):36-42. PubMed ID: 152738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Refusing treatment for incompetent patients; why Quinlan and Saikewicz cases agree on roles of guardians, physicians, judges, and ethics committees.
    Annas GJ
    N Y State J Med; 1980 Apr; 80(5):816-21. PubMed ID: 6930563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I.
    Suber DG; Tabor WJ
    JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.