BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5070664)

  • 1. [Temporal masking: forward effects in normal and hypacusic subjects].
    Salonna F; Quaranta A
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1972 May; 48(10):260-3. PubMed ID: 5070664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Effect of central masking on behavior of auditory threshold values in normal persons and those with hypacusis].
    Quaranta A; Salonna F
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1972 May; 48(10):256-9. PubMed ID: 5070663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Study of the classical and modified alternate binaural loudness balance tests in normal and pathological ears.
    Sung RJ; Sung GS
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):49-53. PubMed ID: 977430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Automatic audiometry under masking effect in hypacusic subjects].
    Cervellera G; Salonna F; Quaranta A
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1970; 22(6):378-86. PubMed ID: 5525888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perstimulatory suprathreshold adaptation. 3. Sensorineural deafness.
    Kärjä J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974; 78(1-2):73-80. PubMed ID: 4415034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Study of auditory perception of ultrasound and low frequency tones for the diagnosis of hearing disorders in Meniere's disease].
    Radugin KB; Ryzhkov AP
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1973; 35(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 4781552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative diagnostic test for active Ménière's disease and cochlear hydrops using high-pass noise masked responses: the complex amplitude ratio.
    Don M; Kwong B; Tanaka C
    Audiol Neurootol; 2007; 12(6):359-70. PubMed ID: 17664867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Intergration of auditory signals in normal hearing and in hearing disorders].
    Soucková S
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1973 Oct; 22(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 4762466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electric response audiometry in a clinical practice.
    Brackmann DE
    Laryngoscope; 1977 May; 87(5 Pt 2 Suppl 5):1-33. PubMed ID: 323607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic significance of the electrocochleogram in clinical audiometry.
    Yoshie N
    Audiology; 1973; 12(5):504-39. PubMed ID: 4582925
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tone burst auditory brain stem response latency estimates of cochlear travel time in Meniere's disease, cochlear hearing loss, and normal ears.
    Murray JG; Cohn ES; Harker LA; Gorga MP
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):854-9. PubMed ID: 9831168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical audiometry. The influence of stimulus intensity upon evoked auditory potential in the normal person and in cases of hearing loss with recruitment.
    Marco J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1972; 73(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 5015151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of unilateral Ménières disease on masking-level differences.
    Schoeny ZG; Carhart R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Oct; 50(4):1143-50. PubMed ID: 5117646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Acoustic agnosia].
    Loebell E
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1973 Feb; 107(2):58-64. PubMed ID: 4691747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SISI test and adaptation. III. Subjects with perceptive hearing defects.
    Rahko T
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1975; 80(1-2):74-80. PubMed ID: 1166782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Fluctuating hearing loss].
    Soldatov IB; Khrappo NS
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1979; (2):1-6. PubMed ID: 433407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiometry with nasally presented masking noise: novel diagnostic method for patulous eustachian tube.
    Hori Y; Kawase T; Hasegawa J; Sato T; Yoshida N; Oshima T; Suetake M; Kobayashi T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):596-9. PubMed ID: 16868507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Differential threshold and perstimulatory and poststimulatory masking in the diagnosis of hearing fatique].
    Tománek R
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1972 Jun; 21(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 5043236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contingent negative variations and differential hearing thresholds.
    Brix R
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1976 Nov; 97 Suppl():602-12. PubMed ID: 1019445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evoked auditory responses in subjects with normal hearing].
    Dolhen P; Chantry P
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988; 42(4):455-62. PubMed ID: 3218494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.