These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5070864)
1. Relative efficacy. When the government decides what drug should be prescribed, is the patient better served? J Med Assoc State Ala; 1972 Sep; 42(3):200-12. PubMed ID: 5070864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Relative efficacy. When the government decides what drugs should be prescribed, is the patient better served? Ohio State Med J; 1972 Aug; 68(8):748-52 passim. PubMed ID: 5077306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Relative efficacy. When the government decides what drug should be prescribed, is the patient better served? J Tenn Med Assoc; 1972 Aug; 65(8):748-51. PubMed ID: 4671687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative efficacy. J Okla State Med Assoc; 1973 Mar; 66(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 4689645 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Use of drugs for unapproved indications: your legal responsibility. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1972 Dec; 51(12):493-5. PubMed ID: 4637969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Keeping prescription drugs safe and effective. Bryan PA Am Fam Physician; 1974 Nov; 10(5):189-93. PubMed ID: 4421343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. How does the FDA affect you and your practice? Novitch M Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 Mar; 7(3):23-6. PubMed ID: 423685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The control of drugs and therapeutic freedom. Dunlop D Proc R Soc Med; 1968 Aug; 61(8):841-6. PubMed ID: 5695368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative efficacy. Stetler CJ J Miss State Med Assoc; 1972 Oct; 13(10):427-32. PubMed ID: 5070310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The regulatory role of the United States Food and Drug Administration. Ortiz EM J Reprod Med; 1972 Apr; 8(4):205-6. PubMed ID: 5029971 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. On the "costs" of the 1962 drug amendments. Smith MC; Visconti JA Inquiry; 1974 Mar; 11(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 4274295 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Professional drug labeling. Terry M J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1993 May; 202(10):1711-2;discussion 1713-7. PubMed ID: 8514591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Package inserts, adverse drug reactions, and the physician's liability. Morrell MX Ration Drug Ther; 1975 Aug; 9(8):1-6. PubMed ID: 1144773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Relative efficacy. Stetler CJ J Med Assoc Ga; 1972 Sep; 61(9):312-5. PubMed ID: 5080001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Drugs and the Washington climate. Durant TM Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1969; 80():196-204. PubMed ID: 4896316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Cooling it' on tranquilizers. Morrison M FDA Consum; 1975 Apr; 9(3):16-7. PubMed ID: 10308674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Drug control in the USA]. Gram LF Ugeskr Laeger; 1973 Nov; 135(47):2557-60. PubMed ID: 4782892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is it a cosmetic, a drug, or both? (Or is it soap?). Center for Safety and Applied Nutrition/Office of Cosmetics and Colors US Food and Drug Administration Plast Surg Nurs; 2008; 28(4):195-7. PubMed ID: 19092587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Black box warnings in prescription drug labeling: results of a survey of 206 drugs. Beach JE; Faich GA; Bormel FG; Sasinowski FJ Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(3):403-11. PubMed ID: 10346718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Therapeutic freedom. Trout ME J Leg Med (N Y); 1974; 2(5):40-2. PubMed ID: 4548704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]