These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Effects of dorsolateral frontal lesions on responsiveness to various stimulus parameters in the pigtail monkey. Hannon R; Kamback M Exp Neurol; 1972 Oct; 37(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 4627798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of frontal lobe lesions upon behavior requiring use of response-produced cues. Wagman AM J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1968 Aug; 66(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 5672642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Effects of cortical lesions on tactile discriminations graded in difficulty. Finger S; Frommer GP Life Sci; 1968 Sep; 7(18):897-904. PubMed ID: 5712714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of changes in indirect delayed response performance in monkeys with prefrontal lesions. Buddington RW; King FA; Roberts L J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 May; 68(1):147-54. PubMed ID: 4978419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of maze learning on spatial and confounded discriminations by caimans and toads. Williams JT Percept Mot Skills; 1967 Oct; 25(2):585-8. PubMed ID: 6080638 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Supplementary visual stimuli and rotary pursuit performance. Gordon NB; Warner A Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Dec; 27(3):815-25. PubMed ID: 5720382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Contralateral 'neglect' after unilateral dorsomedial prefrontal lesions in rats. Cowey A; Bozek T Brain Res; 1974 May; 72(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 4830476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. EFFECTS OF CONTROL-DISPLAY COMPATIBILITY AND MONITORING CUES ON MULTIPLE-TASK PERFORMANCE. SMITH S; FARRELL RJ; GONZALEZ BK Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Jun; 20():781-5. PubMed ID: 14313994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. THE EFFECT OF INTRA-MAZE VISUAL CUES ON RETURN REACTION IN RATS. LUKASZEWSKA I Acta Biol Exp (Warsz); 1964; 24():153-9. PubMed ID: 14167128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Effects of visual and verbal cues on learning a motor skill. KARLIN L; MORTIMER RG J Exp Psychol; 1962 Dec; 64():608-14. PubMed ID: 13962517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Searching for traffic signals while engaged in compensatory tracking. Noble M; Sanders AF Hum Factors; 1980 Feb; 22(1):89-102. PubMed ID: 7364449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Incidental cue utilization as a function of its incentive-produced validity under two levels of water deprivation. Cohen JS; Burtt B; Gates R Psychol Rep; 1980 Apr; 46(2):527-34. PubMed ID: 7384357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Food detection by deer mice using olfactory rather than visual cues. Howard WE; Marsh RE; Cole RE Anim Behav; 1968 Feb; 16(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 5639893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A new technology and field test of advance cue usage in volleyball. Starkes JL; Edwards P; Dissanayake P; Dunn T Res Q Exerc Sport; 1995 Jun; 66(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 7644836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The efficiency of the serial multiple visual discrimination apparatus and method with white rats. FIELDS PE J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1953 Feb; 46(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 13034959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of intra-maze delay. 6. Different extra-maze cues between anterior and posterior sections. BROWN WL; DALRYMPLE HB J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1951 Dec; 44(6):604-7. PubMed ID: 14897966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Impairment of utilization of response-produced cues after frontopolar lesions in rats. Lukaszewska I Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1972; 32(2):513-24. PubMed ID: 5075636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]