These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5078917)
1. [Causes of lacking coincidence between cytology and histology in gynecologic cancer screening (errors of cytology, histology and clinical diagnosis)]. Soost HJ Beitr Pathol; 1972; 147(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 5078917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [The role of colposcopy in evaluation of the cervix for unexpectedly positive pap smears]. Jesień-Sokołowska U; Madej JG Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 10375918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Invasive cervix cancer in spite of gynecologic health control]. Björkholm E; Pettersson F Lakartidningen; 1979 Jan; 76(5):281-2. PubMed ID: 759774 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparison of dubious and positive cervical cytological examinations for neoplasms and correlated histological examinations made 1970-1980 at the Savona Hospital]. Ballerini D; De Pirro W; Nadin C Pathologica; 1981; 73(1027):793-803. PubMed ID: 7043381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical cytology in gynecologic problems]. Johannisson E Lakartidningen; 1969 Nov; 66(45):4659-67. PubMed ID: 5405936 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Automatic screening of Papanicolaou stained cervical smears with the T. A. S. Meyer F; van Driel A Microsc Acta Suppl; 1980; Suppl 4():82-95. PubMed ID: 6157078 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Diagnostic cytology and histology in the gynecologic malignant tumors]. Sugishita T Gan No Rinsho; 1990 Aug; 36(10):1117-22. PubMed ID: 2214147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Defending the pap smear: a proactive approach to the litigation threat in gynecologic cytology. McCoy DR Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Nov; 114 Suppl():S52-8. PubMed ID: 11996170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Reinvestigation of crucial cases where first diagnosis by mailing smear test disagrees with second diagnosis by cytology and/or biopsy. Noda S; Terakawa N; Abe Y Acta Obstet Gynaecol Jpn; 1976 Jul; 23(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 1026045 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Colpocytologic observations in patients treated with diathermo-coagulation of the portio]. Berlingieri D Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Feb; 23(4):182-6. PubMed ID: 5566865 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [An operative model: verification of the quality of the screening Pap test ]. Montanari GR; Arnaud S; Berardengo E; Campione D; Cozzani C; Parisio F; Viberti L; Ghiringhello B Pathologica; 2001 Oct; 93(5):609-10. PubMed ID: 11725370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cytologic reports of MAC (Malignancy Associated Changes sec. Nieburgs) in cases of gynecologic neoplasms]. Martuzzi M; Amadori D; Saragoni A Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Feb; 23(4):198-204. PubMed ID: 5566868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vaginal pipette and cervical smear. Comparison of their diagnostic reliability in screening]. Mikkelsen JF; Arffmann E Ugeskr Laeger; 1976 Apr; 138(17):1021-5. PubMed ID: 1265884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The value of mass cytological screening programme in the early detection of cervical cancer. Devi NN; Vijayalakshmi A; Nair MB; Devi KR J Indian Med Assoc; 1974 Aug; 63(3):92-5. PubMed ID: 4443577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Cytological study of an inflammatory type Pap-test]. Giannone R; Bernorio R; Panizzardi G; Piacezzi C; Poli M Minerva Ginecol; 1992 Jun; 44(6):321-4. PubMed ID: 1635655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo]. Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]