These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5082172)

  • 21. Comparison of cognition and performance in patients with organic brain damage and psychiatric patients.
    Harness BZ; Bental E; Carmon A
    Acta Psychiatr Belg; 1977; 77(3):339-47. PubMed ID: 920220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance characteristics of chronic schizophrenia on attention tests sensitive to unilateral brain damage.
    Mizuno M; Kato M; Sartori G; Okawara H; Kashima H
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1997 Jul; 185(7):427-33. PubMed ID: 9240360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Schizophrenic vs. brain-damaged performance on the Holtzman Inkblot Technique.
    Velez-Diaz A
    J Clin Psychol; 1976 Jan; 32(1):177-8. PubMed ID: 1249222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Differential MMPI performance of brain-damaged vs. pseudo-neurologic groups.
    Shaw DJ; Matthews CG
    J Clin Psychol; 1965 Oct; 21(4):405-8. PubMed ID: 4378520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validation of a brain-damage vs. schizophrenia MMPI key.
    Russell EW
    J Clin Psychol; 1975 Oct; 31(4):659-61. PubMed ID: 1194419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Vigilance and arousal: effects of different types of background stimulation.
    Davenport WG
    J Psychol; 1972 Nov; 82(2d Half):339-46. PubMed ID: 4655558
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The relationships between psychopathology and evoked responses before, during, and after psychotropic drug treatment.
    Saletu B; Saletu M; Itil TM
    Biol Psychiatry; 1973 Feb; 6(1):45-74. PubMed ID: 4710776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The Holtzman Inkblot Technique in the assessment of organic brain damage.
    Velez-Diaz A
    J Clin Psychol; 1975 Oct; 31(4):753-7. PubMed ID: 1194439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Perception-response speed and driving capabilities of brain-damaged and older drivers.
    Korteling JE
    Hum Factors; 1990 Feb; 32(1):95-108. PubMed ID: 2376411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differentiating brain damage from schizophrenia: a further test of Russell's MMPI key.
    Trifiletti RJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1982 Jan; 38(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 7056872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Concentration ability in patients with organic cerebral lesions and neurotic disorders in comparison with healthy subjects].
    Rentzsch G
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1971 Aug; 23(8):484-93. PubMed ID: 5149309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A three-mode factor analysis of clinical judgment of schizophrenicity.
    Mills DH; Tucker LR
    J Clin Psychol; 1966 Apr; 22(2):136-9. PubMed ID: 5937034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cross-validation of an MMPI scale of differential diagnosis of brain damage from schizophrenia.
    Neuringer C; Dombrowski PS; Goldstein G
    J Clin Psychol; 1975 Apr; 31(2):268-71. PubMed ID: 1133187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Delayed sensory motor processing following cerebral damage. II. A multisensory defect.
    Belmont I; Handler A; Karp E
    J Nerv Ment Dis; 1972 Nov; 155(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 5082170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selective attention in schizophrenia: sparing and loss of executive control.
    Mathalon DH; Heinks T; Ford JM
    Am J Psychiatry; 2004 May; 161(5):872-81. PubMed ID: 15121653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An analysis of the human brain stem auditory evoked response yielding new criteria for defining its abnormality.
    Thomas JG
    J Neurol Sci; 1984 Feb; 63(2):207-28. PubMed ID: 6707692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Speech-Sounds Perception Test: analysis of error types in normal and diffusely brain-damaged patients.
    Charter RA; Dutra RL; Lopez MN
    Percept Mot Skills; 1997 Jun; 84(3 Pt 2):1507-10. PubMed ID: 9229477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Perception of the auditory midline and visual vertical in brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged humans.
    Welch RB; Goldstein G; Shelly CH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Oct; 37(2):627-34. PubMed ID: 4747397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-validation of a WAIS sign developed to separate brain-damaged from schizophrenc patients.
    Watson CG
    J Clin Psychol; 1972 Jan; 28(1):66-7. PubMed ID: 5058003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rate of stimulation affects schizophrenia-normal differences on the N1 auditory-evoked potential.
    Gilmore CS; Clementz BA; Buckley PF
    Neuroreport; 2004 Dec; 15(18):2713-7. PubMed ID: 15597040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.