These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5082219)

  • 21. Can defendants with mental retardation successfully fake their performance on a test of competence to stand trial?
    Everington C; Notario-Smull H; Horton ML
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(4):545-60. PubMed ID: 17486631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [The mentally retarded in court--care is more important than precision in diagnosis].
    Grunewald K
    Lakartidningen; 1969 Apr; 66(14):1465-9. PubMed ID: 5768981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The functions of forensic psychiatry for service for the mentally retarded. Forensic consequences of interpretation of the service for mentally retarded according to the directives outlined in report no. 781].
    Svendsen BB
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1977 Oct; 139(40):2409-13. PubMed ID: 910312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A National Survey of State Legislation defining mental retardation: implications for policy and practice after Atkins.
    DeMatteo D; Marczyk G; Pich M
    Behav Sci Law; 2007; 25(6):781-802. PubMed ID: 18046743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessing competency competently: toward a rational standard for competency-to-stand-trial assessments.
    Morris GH; Haroun AM; Naimark D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):231-45. PubMed ID: 15515910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Commentary: Atkins and clinical practice.
    Weiss KJ; Haskins B; Hauser MJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(3):309-13. PubMed ID: 15515920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
    Klein DW
    Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing competency to stand trial: a case study of technology diffusion in four states.
    Schreiber J
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1978; 6(4):439-57. PubMed ID: 752385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating competency to stand trial with evidence-based practice.
    Rogers R; Johansson-Love J
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):450-60. PubMed ID: 20018994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Legal psychiatric functions after decentralization of the Danish Services for the Mentally Retarded. A review of current rules and statistical illustration].
    Lund J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1983 Jun; 145(24):1896-9. PubMed ID: 6612807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Disagreements between court and psychiatrist on competency to stand trial.
    Reich JH; Tookey L
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1986 Jan; 47(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 3941053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance of mentally retarded forensic patients on the test of memory malingering.
    Simon MJ
    J Clin Psychol; 2007 Apr; 63(4):339-44. PubMed ID: 17279523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Landmark?: United States Supreme Court recognized the issue of the constitutional rights of civilly committed mental patients.
    Brown A
    J Am Health Care Assoc; 1976 Jan; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 10246882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A new pretrial screening program.
    Rappeport JR; Conti NP; Rudnick B
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1983; 11(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 6640118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of a television crime-drama series to promote legal understanding in mentally ill, incompetent defendants: a pilot study.
    Montgomery J; Brooks MH
    J Forensic Sci; 2005 Mar; 50(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 15813561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Supreme Court and madness: a middle ground on proof of mental illness for commitment.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1979 Aug; 301(6):317-8. PubMed ID: 450018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Medicolegal aspects of mental retardation.
    Smith SM; Kunjukrishnan R
    Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1986 Dec; 9(4):699-712. PubMed ID: 3543891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Mentally ill persons who commit crimes: punishment or treatment?
    Melamed Y
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 20305082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unnecessary coercion: an end to involuntary civil commitment of retarded persons.
    Dybwad G; Herr SS
    Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 31(4):753-65. PubMed ID: 10242375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?
    Leong GB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(3):292-4. PubMed ID: 16186189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.