These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5089071)

  • 1. Effect of selected form attachment devices on oral stereognosis scores.
    La Pointe LL; Williams WN
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Apr; 32(2):469-70. PubMed ID: 5089071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-oral recognition of geometric forms by normal subjects.
    Williams WN; La Pointe LL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Apr; 32(2):419-26. PubMed ID: 5089065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Oral sensation and perception in dysarthric adults.
    Creech RJ; Wertz RT; Rosenbek JC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Aug; 37(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 4734067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retention of shape information under haptic or visual acquisition.
    Abravanel E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):683-90. PubMed ID: 4704304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Oral kinesthetic sensitivity and the perception of speech.
    Larsen SG; Hudson FG
    Child Dev; 1973 Dec; 44(4):845-8. PubMed ID: 4751306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Illusion in size perception of intra-orally presented holes.
    La Pointe LL; Williams WN; Hepler EL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1047-50. PubMed ID: 4711948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oral stereognosis in predicting speech performance: preliminary report.
    Schliesser HF; Cary MH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 4704308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Deaf and hearing children's performance on a tactual perception battery.
    Schiff W; Dytell RS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Dec; 35(3):683-706. PubMed ID: 4643958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of spatial integration in the perception of surface orientation with active touch.
    Giachritsis CD; Wing AM; Lovell PG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1628-40. PubMed ID: 19801622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech-sound discrimination and tactile-kinesthetic discrimination in reference to speech production.
    Madison CL; Fucci DJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Dec; 33(3):831-8. PubMed ID: 5127203
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tactual discrimination and motor skills in mongoloid and non-mongoloid retardates and normal children.
    Knights RM; Atkinson BR; Hyman JA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1967 May; 71(6):894-900. PubMed ID: 4226674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Selective attention in fast and slow learners.
    Hunt D; Randhawa BS; Fitzgerald D
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Jun; 44(3 Pt 1):959-65. PubMed ID: 876808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of interpolated tasks on latency and accuracy of intramodal and cross-modal shape recognition by children.
    Millar S
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):170-5. PubMed ID: 5083121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of physical size and complexity on tactual discrimination of blind children.
    Berla EP
    Except Child; 1972 Oct; 39(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 4651216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blindness enhances tactile acuity and haptic 3-D shape discrimination.
    Norman JF; Bartholomew AN
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2323-31. PubMed ID: 21671153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Observations on testing the stroke patient for oral stereognosis.
    Solomon AP; Zafran JN; Zayon GM
    Temple Dent Rev; 1969; 39(2):11-5. PubMed ID: 5261782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Form discrimination performance of linguistically retarded children.
    De la Peña A; Hirsh R; Eisenson J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):187-94. PubMed ID: 4686709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The kinesthetic aftereffect: ritual versus requisites.
    Weintraub DJ; Herzog TR
    Am J Psychol; 1973 Jun; 86(2):407-23. PubMed ID: 4775382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oral stereognostic differences between apraxics, dysarthrics, aphasics, and normals.
    Teixeira LA; Defran RH; Nichols AC
    J Commun Disord; 1974 Sep; 7(3):213-25. PubMed ID: 4443430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual and haptic angle perception in the matching task.
    Appelle S
    Am J Psychol; 1971 Dec; 84(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 5142061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.