These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 509204)

  • 1. Stroop interference in the left and right visual fields.
    Tsao Y; Feustel T; Soseos C
    Brain Lang; 1979 Nov; 8(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 509204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli.
    Kahneman D; Chajczyk D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1983 Aug; 9(4):497-509. PubMed ID: 6224888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Naming and discrimination of Chinese ideograms presented in the right and left visual fields.
    Huang YL; Jones B
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(6):703-6. PubMed ID: 7465031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Left and right visual field superiority for letter classification.
    Jonides J
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1979 Aug; 31(3):423-39. PubMed ID: 504547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent validity of a children's version of the Stroop Color-Word Test: the Fruit Distraction Test.
    Cammock T; Cairns E
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Oct; 49(2):611-6. PubMed ID: 514782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemispheric asymmetry for alphabetic identification: scaling analyses.
    Schmuller J
    Brain Lang; 1979 Nov; 8(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 509198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The influence of similarity in the naming of Stroop items].
    Effler M
    Arch Psychol (Frankf); 1978; 131(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 755459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Left visual field superiority in a letter-naming task for both left- and right-handers.
    Bashore TR; Nydegger RV; Miller H
    Cortex; 1982 Jul; 18(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 7128173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatio-temporal discrimination of frequency in the right and left visual fields: a preliminary report.
    Rao SM; Rourke D; Whitman RD
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Aug; 53(1):311-6. PubMed ID: 7290879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli.
    Alivisatos B; Wilding J
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 7187633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognition of upright and inverted faces presented in the left and right visual fields.
    Ellis HD; Shepherd JW
    Cortex; 1975 Mar; 11(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 1149464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global versus local processing: is there a hemispheric dichotomy?
    Boles DB
    Neuropsychologia; 1984; 22(4):445-55. PubMed ID: 6483171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric differences in processing visual patterns.
    Bradshaw JL; Gates A; Patterson K
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1976 Nov; 28(4):667-81. PubMed ID: 1013284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interference effects in the picture-word stroop task.
    Toma RJ; Tsao YC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1985 Aug; 61(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 4047882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilateral tachistoscopic perception, handedness, and laterality.
    Schmuller J; Goodman R
    Brain Lang; 1979 Jul; 8(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 476478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Symmetry and similarity effects in the comparison of visual patterns.
    Bagnara S; Boles DB; Simion F; Umilta C
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):578-84. PubMed ID: 6664816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reversal of Stroop test: interference in word reading.
    Nealis PM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 4824061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration.
    Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual-field differences for a number--non-number classification of alphabetic and ideographic stimuli.
    Peereman R; Holender D
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1985 May; 37(2):197-216. PubMed ID: 4023272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemispheric functions in the processing of agent-patient information.
    Segalowitz N; Hansson P
    Brain Lang; 1979 Jul; 8(1):51-61. PubMed ID: 476475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.