These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5094197)

  • 1. Reduction of patient exposure during dental radiography.
    Bushong SC; Galbreath JC; Garris R; Merritt E
    Health Phys; 1971 Aug; 21(2):281-4. PubMed ID: 5094197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Leaded shields for thyroid dose reduction in intraoral dental radiography.
    Whitcher BL; Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1979 Dec; 48(6):567-70. PubMed ID: 292963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction to the thyroid gland in intraoral source radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Sakoh T; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8508936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A leaded apron for use in panoramic dental radiography.
    Whitcher BL; Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 May; 49(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 6929470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
    Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Thyroid dose distribution in dental radiography.
    Bristow RG; Wood RE; Clark GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Oct; 68(4):482-7. PubMed ID: 2797745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of radiation doses received during examinations with the pantomograph, orthopantomograph, Panorex, Status-X and conventional roentgen apparatus.
    Altonen M; Heikkilä M; Mattila K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1974 Apr; 70(2):67-74. PubMed ID: 4831509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
    Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
    Qu XM; Li G; Ludlow JB; Zhang ZY; Ma XC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Dec; 110(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 20952220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vivo, thyroid and lens surface exposure with spiral and conventional computed tomography in dental implant radiography.
    Bianchi J; Goggins W; Rudolph M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Aug; 90(2):249-53. PubMed ID: 10936846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Demonstrating That High kVp Results in Lower Patient Dose.
    Golubieski-Carpenter ME
    Radiol Technol; 2019 May; 90(5):517-519. PubMed ID: 31088955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimizing radiation exposure in dental radiology.
    Lilienthal B; Rak D; Wang J
    Aust Dent J; 1975 Feb; 20(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 1057884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Radiation dosimetry in specific area radiography.
    Brand JW; Kuba RK; Aeppli DM; Johnson JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Mar; 67(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 2648245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiation dosage from use of the image intensifier in orthopaedic surgery.
    Lo NN; Goh PS; Khong KS
    Singapore Med J; 1996 Feb; 37(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 8783918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Radiation protection of the patients in radiodiagnostics. Choice of dosimeters].
    Boulenger R
    J Belge Radiol; 1971; 54(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 5145144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An improved head-and-neck phantom for radiation dosimetry.
    Brand JW; Kuba RK; Braunreiter TC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1989 Mar; 67(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 2648244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental orthopantomography: survey of patient dose.
    Bartolotta A; Calenda E; Calicchia A; Indovina PL
    Radiology; 1983 Mar; 146(3):821-3. PubMed ID: 6828699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dose from scattered roentgen radiation to a protected part of a mouse phantom.
    Bojtor I; Hiesche K; Schnell PO
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1974 Feb; 13(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 4826855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Absorbed dose determination for tomographic implant site assessment techniques.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NE; McDavid WD; Goshorn B; Ahrens CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Apr; 73(4):502-9. PubMed ID: 1574314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.