These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5094197)

  • 21. Does the lead apron and collar always reduce radiation dose?
    Nortje CJ; Harris AM; Lackovic KP; Wood RE
    SADJ; 2001 Nov; 56(11):502-4. PubMed ID: 11885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Energy and angle dependence of calcium fluoride and lithium fluoride thermoluminescent dosimetry systems.
    Gibbs SJ; Mitchell AC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1974 Apr; 37(4):641-8. PubMed ID: 4521954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of device position on the operator's radiation dose when using a handheld portable X-ray device.
    Makdissi J; Pawar RR; Johnson B; Chong BS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150245. PubMed ID: 26764582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimisation of patient doses in programmable dental panoramic radiography.
    Lecomber AR; Downes SL; Mokhtari M; Faulkner K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10808225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficiency of the cervical lead shield during intraoral radiography.
    Kaffe I; Littner MM; Shlezinger T; Segal P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Dec; 62(6):732-6. PubMed ID: 3467297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A film-thermoluminescent dosimetry method for predicting body doses due to diagnostic radiography.
    Vacirca SJ; Thompson DL; Pasternack BS; Blatz H
    Phys Med Biol; 1972 Jan; 17(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 5071504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A study on radiation dose in dental radiography measured on human body and phantom.
    Yan YH; Lin LM; Huang YL; Lian SL; Hsu PC; Weng PS
    Gaoxiong Yi Xue Ke Xue Za Zhi; 1987 Mar; 3(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 3471975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Radiation dose related to collimator geometry in the first generation EMI scanner.
    Axelsson B; Bergström M
    Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol; 1978; 17(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 717045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dosimetry at interfaces. Theoretical analysis and measurements by means of thermoluminescent LiF at plane interfaces between a low Z-material and Al, Cu, Sn or Pb irradiated with 100 to 200 kV roentgen radiation.
    Carlsson GA
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1973; 332():1-64. PubMed ID: 4519462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Efficacy of lead foil for reducing doses in the head and neck: a simulation study using digital intraoral systems.
    Nejaim Y; Silva AI; Brasil DM; Vasconcelos KF; Haiter Neto F; Boscolo FN
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150065. PubMed ID: 26084474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technique-dependent decrease in thyroid absorbed dose for dental radiography.
    Wood RE; Bristow RG; Clark GM; Nussbaum C; Taylor KW
    Health Phys; 1989 Jun; 56(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 2722512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Thermoluminescence from adhesive coated teflon tape.
    Shipler DB; Nichols LL; Kocher LF
    Health Phys; 1972 Feb; 22(2):195-6. PubMed ID: 5014878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Absorbed organ and effective doses from digital intra-oral and panoramic radiography applying the ICRP 103 recommendations for effective dose estimations.
    Granlund C; Thilander-Klang A; Ylhan B; Lofthag-Hansen S; Ekestubbe A
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Oct; 89(1066):20151052. PubMed ID: 27452261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions.
    Carlson SK
    Health Phys; 2004 Jan; 86(1):95-6; author reply 96. PubMed ID: 14695013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiation doses of commonly used dental radiographic surveys.
    Freeman JP; Brand JW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Mar; 77(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 8170662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dose reduction in orthodontic lateral cephalography: dosimetric evaluation of a novel cephalographic thyroid protector (CTP) and anatomical cranial collimation (ACC).
    Hoogeveen RC; Rottke D; van der Stelt PF; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(4):20140260. PubMed ID: 25564885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Dental CT: image quality and radiation exposure in relation to scan parameters].
    Schorn C; Visser H; Hermann KP; Alamo L; Funke M; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1999 Feb; 170(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10101352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Passive dosimetry measurements on board the Skylab II mission.
    Wailly LF; Schneider MF; Janni JF; Grimm AD; Ainsworth GC
    Aerosp Med; 1974 Nov; 45(11):1237-43. PubMed ID: 4429065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8593910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.