These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A perceptual program for classroom teachers: some results. Walker RN; Streff J Genet Psychol Monogr; 1973 May; 87(2):253-88. PubMed ID: 4714921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How to make a boring thing more boring. Zivin G Child Dev; 1974 Mar; 45(1):232-6. PubMed ID: 4820281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Differences between reflective and impulsive children in tempo and quality of decision making. Mann L Child Dev; 1973 Jun; 44(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 4705554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Perception of verticality on a modified portable Rod-and frame Test. Handel A Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Apr; 34(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 5021793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Developmental changes in infant visual preferences for novelty and familiarity. Wetherford MJ; Cohen LB Child Dev; 1973 Sep; 44(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 4730528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Creativity and related processes in the young child: a review of the literature. Arasteh JD J Genet Psychol; 1968 Mar; 112(1st Half):77-108. PubMed ID: 4870608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Structured vs unstructured visual-motor tests for educable retarded children. Krauft VR; Krauft CC Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):691-4. PubMed ID: 5040478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Visual scanning strategies of reflective, impulsive, fast-accurate, and slow-inaccurate children on the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Ault RL; Crawford DE; Jeffrey WE Child Dev; 1972 Dec; 43(4):1412-7. PubMed ID: 4643777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Preliminary investigation of the visuo-motor recall test. Barclay A; Yater A; Wechsler D Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Jun; 34(3):867-72. PubMed ID: 5040501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Significance of WISC verbal-performance discrepancies for younger children with learning disabilities. Rourke BP; Dietrich DM; Young GC Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):275-82. PubMed ID: 4686722 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of the Visual Retention Test as a group-administered instrument for young children. Bobele RM Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Aug; 43(1):267-72. PubMed ID: 958823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A study of visual perception among aged people. Lerea L; Rathey UK J Psychol; 1972 Sep; 82(1st Half):59-66. PubMed ID: 5053933 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Image control from childhood to adolescence. Wolmer L; Laor N; Toren P Percept Mot Skills; 1999 Oct; 89(2):471-85. PubMed ID: 10597584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Postural variations as a function of vigilance and activity in normal and visually handicapped young girls between 5 and 11 years old]. Ganancia M Agressologie; 1972; 13():Suppl B:81-9. PubMed ID: 5078834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual activity and concept attainment. Elkind D; van Doorninck W; Schwarz C Child Dev; 1967 Dec; 38(4):1153-61. PubMed ID: 5583061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration and the Bender-Gestalt test. Brown MJ Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 1):981-2. PubMed ID: 600660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]