These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5097344)

  • 1. [Influence of masking noise on the threshold of bone conduction].
    Rakhmilevich AG
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1971; 33(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 5097344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Masking with wide-range and narrow-range noise in audiometric examination of the thresholds of bone conductivity].
    Barsukov AF
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1978; (2):33-7. PubMed ID: 644738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Stapedial reflex under auditory masking of bone canal: 1- The effect of white noise on threshold values].
    Cassano P; Mininni F; Paulillo A
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1983 Nov; 59(11):1698-703. PubMed ID: 6667312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The masking dilemma and its solution. Fusion at the inferred threshold (FIT) and sensorineural acuity level (SAL) tests.
    Chaplin RG; Miyamoto RT
    Am J Otol; 1983 Jul; 5(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 6881307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Objective auditory threshold determination using respiratory sound as indicator].
    Kumpf W
    HNO; 1968 Feb; 16(2):52-3. PubMed ID: 5723073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Ototopics as a functional-prognostic test of the surgical treatment of otosclerosis].
    Rudenko VP
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1967; 27(2):20-5. PubMed ID: 5620662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pure-tone air conduction audiogram.
    Bragg VC
    Aerosp Med; 1970 Mar; 41(3):264-8. PubMed ID: 5417366
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Features of the detection of auditory signals of different duration under the influence of several pharmacologic substances].
    Baru AV
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1967; 17(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 5620984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical state of audiometers in hearing conservation programmes - Can we determine hearing threshold correctly?
    Pfeiffer BH
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):283-91. PubMed ID: 6939099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [The relationship between air and bone conduction auditory thresholds and some basic problems of modern audiometry].
    Sagalovich BM
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1971; 33(2):13-9. PubMed ID: 5120912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Re: Noise levels generated within the external auditory canal during microsuction aural toilet and the effect on hearing: a prospective controlled series.
    Baguley DM; Knight RD
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 34(3):261; author reply 262. PubMed ID: 19531188
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Effect of masked noise on the bone conduction threshold].
    Pigulevskiĭ DA; Kozhevnikova AP
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1967; 27(2):38-43. PubMed ID: 5620665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Comparative measurement of the dampening effect of antiphones on patients and on the temporal bone preparation].
    Cancura W; Scheiblechner H; Schwetz F
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1971; 105(12):543-57. PubMed ID: 5144398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improvement in bone conduction threshold after tympanoplasty.
    Tüz M; Doğru H; Uygur K; Gedikli O
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2000 Dec; 123(6):775-8. PubMed ID: 11112978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Practicum in audiometry. II. Threshold audiometry: audiometer, hearing examination rooms, technic of auditory threshold determination].
    Niemeyer W
    HNO; 1970 Feb; 18(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 5444189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Audiometry with nasally presented masking noise: novel diagnostic method for patulous eustachian tube.
    Hori Y; Kawase T; Hasegawa J; Sato T; Yoshida N; Oshima T; Suetake M; Kobayashi T
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):596-9. PubMed ID: 16868507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ; Snik AF; van der Pouw CT; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple auditory steady-state response thresholds to bone-conduction stimuli in young infants with normal hearing.
    Small SA; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16672791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bone conduction oscillator placement in testing hearing of selected groups of children.
    Barber PS; Rose DE
    Am J Ment Defic; 1969 Jan; 73(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 5762266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Differential threshold of sound intensity and bone conduction in otosclerotic patients].
    Dunaĭvitser BI
    Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1969; 29(3):100-1. PubMed ID: 5360192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.