These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A study of contraceptive practices in a selected group of urban, Negro mothers in Baltimore. Edmands EM Am J Public Health Nations Health; 1968 Feb; 58(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 5688772 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who needs organized family planning services? A preliminary projection, 1971-1975. Jaffe FS; Dryfoos JG; Varky G Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Jul; 3(3):22-32. PubMed ID: 5122274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of national health programs. IV. Louisiana family planning. Beasley JD; Frankowski RF; Hawkins CM Am J Public Health; 1971 Sep; 61(9):1812-25. PubMed ID: 5565447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Acceptance of family planning among a cohort of recently delivered mothers. Emerson L; Gordon R; Roman S; Koike M; Speidel JJ Am J Public Health Nations Health; 1968 Sep; 58(9):1738-45. PubMed ID: 5692060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The development of a family planning program for private patients in a community hospital. Fischman SH; Katz SH; Sprague SG Am J Public Health; 1971 Oct; 61(10):2023-30. PubMed ID: 5096806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Orleans parish family planning demonstration program: a description of the first year. Beasley JD; Frankowski RF; Hawkins CM Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1969 Jul; 47(3):225-53. PubMed ID: 5806218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Family planning and conjugal roles in New York City poverty areas. Polgar S; Rothstein F Soc Sci Med (1967); 1970 Jul; 4(1):135-9. PubMed ID: 5478785 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction in family planning. Prediction of the adoption and continued use of contraception. McCalister D; Thiessen V Am J Public Health Nations Health; 1970 Aug; 60(8):1372-81. PubMed ID: 5465449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilization of a family planning program by the poor population of a metropolitan area. Beasley JD; Frankowski RF Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1970 Apr; 48(2):241-81. PubMed ID: 5512497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Family planning in the Negro ghettos of Chicago. Bogue DJ Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1970 Apr; 48(2):283-307. PubMed ID: 5512498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of Health Insurance Among Clients Seeking Contraceptive Services at Title X-Funded Facilities in 2016. Kavanaugh ML; Zolna MR; Burke KL Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2018 Sep; 50(3):101-109. PubMed ID: 29894024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contracepive practice among urban blacks in the United States, 1965. Westoff CF; Ryder NB Milbank Mem Fund Q; 1970 Apr; 48(2):215-39. PubMed ID: 5512495 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Continuation of contraception by low income women: a one year follow-up. Siegel E; Thomas D; Coulter E; Tuthill R; Chipman S Am J Public Health; 1971 Sep; 61(9):1886-98. PubMed ID: 5565452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Louisiana: developing and managing a statewide family planning program. Beasley JD; Wells JP Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Oct; 3(4):68-79. PubMed ID: 5140236 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Toward the reduction of unwanted pregnancy. An assessment of current public and private programs. Jaffe FS Science; 1971 Oct; 174(4005):119-27. PubMed ID: 5119620 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of matched pairs in evaluation of a birth control program. Okada LM Public Health Rep (1896); 1969 May; 84(5):445-50. PubMed ID: 4976809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Family planning counselling. Daily EF Br Med J; 1970 Aug; 3(5718):345-6. PubMed ID: 5451963 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]