136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5098788)
1. The IUD and the pill: extended use-effectiveness.
Tietze C; Lewit S
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Apr; 3(2):53-5. PubMed ID: 5098788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Taiwan: first island-wide pill acceptor follow-up survey.
Sun TH; Chen FL; Chang MC; Cernada GP
Stud Fam Plann; 1970 Dec; 60():18-23. PubMed ID: 5521304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Philippines: family planning acceptors, January-June 1970.
Laing JE
Stud Fam Plann; 1971 May; 2(5):113-9. PubMed ID: 5113352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Contraception and subsequent fertility. Results of a retrospective study].
Spira N; Spira A; Schwartz D
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1985 Jan; 13(1 Suppl):353-8. PubMed ID: 12280206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimation of births averted by family planning programs: the parity approach.
Kelly WJ
Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Sep; 2(9):197-201. PubMed ID: 5128534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Postpartum services in family planning: findings to date.
Forrest JE
Rep Popul Fam Plann; 1971 Jul; 8():1-15. PubMed ID: 5112824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An IUD follow-up study in Potharam, Thailand.
Vimuktanon S; Rosenfield AG
Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Aug; 2(8):166-70. PubMed ID: 5164350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Korea-Taiwan 1970: report on the national family planning programs.
Worth G; Watson WB; Han DW; Finnigan OD; Keeny SM
Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Mar; 2(3):57-69. PubMed ID: 5113346
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. IUD and the pill: a comparative study.
Bergqvist A; Rybo G
Contracept Deliv Syst; 1980 Oct; 1(4):341-7. PubMed ID: 12262136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Hong Kong: oral contraceptive follow-up study.
Chan KC
Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Mar; 2(3):70-4. PubMed ID: 5113347
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of family planning programs in Iran and Turkey.
Fendall NR
HSMHA Health Rep; 1971 Nov; 86(11):1011-24. PubMed ID: 5138279
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Contraception in the latter part of reproductive life.
Robinson GE
Contemp Rev Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Oct; 4(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 12345159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trends in contraceptive use at one university: 1974-1978.
Harvey SM
Fam Plann Perspect; 1980; 12(6):301-4. PubMed ID: 7202693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Population and family planning programs: a factbook.
Nortman D
Rep Popul Fam Plann; 1969 Oct; ():1-48. PubMed ID: 5406198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Contraceptive use effectiveness in Indonesia.
Teachman JD; Parsons JS; Haryono S; Rohadi
Majalah Demografi Indones; 1977 Dec; 4(8):44-61. PubMed ID: 12261120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Canadian county-sponsored family planning. 3. A second survey.
Tyson JE; Washburn HH
Obstet Gynecol; 1970 Mar; 35(3):377-80. PubMed ID: 5416702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reasons and correlates of contraceptive discontinuation in Kuwait.
Shah NM; Shah MA; Chowdhury RI; Menon I
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2007 Sep; 12(3):260-8. PubMed ID: 17763265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods for estimating future caseloads of family planning programs.
Reynolds J
Fam Plann Perspect; 1971 Apr; 3(2):56-61. PubMed ID: 5098789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Catholic parish priests and birth control: a comparative study of opinion in Colombia, the United States, and the Netherlands.
Burch TK; Shea GA
Stud Fam Plann; 1971 Jun; 2(6):121-36. PubMed ID: 5113353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [IUDs and ectopic pregnancy].
Sivin I
Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Dec; 11(12):1287-94. PubMed ID: 12312723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
