These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5108237)
1. More money to fight cancer--will it be worth it? DiBiasio AG Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon; 1971 Apr; 50(4):124. PubMed ID: 5108237 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. National Cancer Act of 1971--an editorial. Weinhouse S Cancer Res; 1972 Apr; 32(4):i-ii. PubMed ID: 5014797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The national cancer act of 1971. J Natl Cancer Inst; 1972 Mar; 48(3):577-84. PubMed ID: 5058965 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Proceedings: The National Cancer Program and the National Cancer Act of 1971. Rauscher FJ Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1974 Feb; 40():3-6. PubMed ID: 4819408 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Government support of biomedical research. Pigman W Fed Proc; 1973 Jul; 32(7):1731-4. PubMed ID: 4718889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Academic institutions get most federal medical research money. J Am Dent Assoc; 1968 Aug; 77(2):242-3. PubMed ID: 5241397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial: How much money--where? Bucy PC Surg Neurol; 1974 Jul; 2(4):246. PubMed ID: 4835357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The 25th anniversary of the National Cancer Act of 1971. Letton AH Cancer; 1996 Dec; 78(12):2597-8. PubMed ID: 8952572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. US cancer institute shifts funds to external research. Wadman M Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6569):4. PubMed ID: 8598902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Funding mechanisms for research through the National Cancer Institute. Clifford CK Cancer Res; 1993 May; 53(10 Suppl):2434s-2435s. PubMed ID: 8485731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Nixon embraces principle of separate cancer authority, but original proponents say they are not yet convinced. Bazell RJ Science; 1971 May; 172(3986):922-3. PubMed ID: 5573564 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. One for the money. Mandavilli A Nat Med; 2005 Jun; 11(6):587-8. PubMed ID: 15937461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lobbyists anticipate more money for all. Macilwain C; Smaglik P Nature; 2000 Jan; 403(6766):123. PubMed ID: 10671144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Big money, little science? Nat Immunol; 2008 Nov; 9(11):1199. PubMed ID: 18936775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Matchmaking, metrics and money: a pathway to progress in translational research. Krontiris TG; Rubenson D Bioessays; 2008 Oct; 30(10):1025-9. PubMed ID: 18800381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Show us the money. Kennedy D Science; 2006 Dec; 314(5805):1515. PubMed ID: 17158292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Management operations of the National Cancer Institute that influence the governance of science. Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1984 May; 64():1-139. PubMed ID: 6749243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reply to 'One for the money'. Snow B Nat Med; 2005 Aug; 11(8):817. PubMed ID: 16079868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]