These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 511189)

  • 1. Joint distribution of z transformations estimated from the same sample.
    Rao DC
    Hum Hered; 1979; 29(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 511189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the properties of maximum likelihood estimators of familial correlations under variable sibship size.
    Wette R; McGue MK; Rao DC; Cloninger CR
    Biometrics; 1988 Sep; 44(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 3203127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative tests for comparing normal distribution parameters based on logistic regression.
    Mantel N; Brown C
    Biometrics; 1974 Sep; 30(3):485-97. PubMed ID: 4411927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sampling truncated distributions.
    Nagylaki T
    Behav Genet; 1973 Jun; 3(2):193-6. PubMed ID: 4730825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Metameters for the statistical treatment of data expressed in percentage values].
    Chiarioni T
    Ateneo Parmense Acta Biomed; 1977; 48(6):551-3. PubMed ID: 610711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An empirical study of the distribution of the sample genetic correlaon coefficient.
    Brown GH
    Biometrics; 1969 Mar; 25(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 5786309
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating sampling error of evolutionary statistics based on genetic covariance matrices using maximum likelihood.
    Houle D; Meyer K
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Aug; 28(8):1542-9. PubMed ID: 26079756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sampling schemes and ascertainment.
    Thompson EA; Cannings C
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1979; 32():363-82. PubMed ID: 523478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proportions with extraneous variance: two dependent samples.
    Kleinman JC
    Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):737-43. PubMed ID: 1174627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A "super-population viewpoint' for finite population sampling.
    Hartley HO; Sielken RL
    Biometrics; 1975 Jun; 31(2):411-22. PubMed ID: 1174615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inferences about linkage disequilibrium.
    Weir BS
    Biometrics; 1979 Mar; 35(1):235-54. PubMed ID: 497335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sampling strategies for the analysis of quantitative traits.
    Moll PP; Sing CF
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1979; 32():307-42. PubMed ID: 392528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assumptions for different ascertainment models in human genetics.
    Williams JS; Stene J
    Biometrics; 1977 Sep; 33(3):523-7. PubMed ID: 911972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sampling considerations in the gathering and analysis of pedigree data.
    Elston RC; Sobel E
    Am J Hum Genet; 1979 Jan; 31(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 373427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data.
    Ury HK
    Biometrics; 1975 Sep; 31(3):643-9. PubMed ID: 1100136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistics for clinicians. 2. Nominal data (I).
    Nanivadekar AS; Kannappan AR
    J Assoc Physicians India; 1990 Dec; 38(12):931-5, 974. PubMed ID: 2096131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relative advantage: a substitute for mean fitness in Fisher's fundamental theorem?
    Garay J; Varga Z
    J Theor Biol; 1999 Dec; 201(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 10600365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nomograms for obtaining a necessary, minimum sample size. I. When distribution of data is normal.
    Takizawa T
    Natl Inst Anim Health Q (Tokyo); 1976; 16(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 1264263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computation of sample size for comparing two proportions.
    Radhakrishna S
    Indian J Med Res; 1983 Jun; 77():915-9. PubMed ID: 6642590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variances of selection differentials in normal samples.
    Burrows PM
    Biometrics; 1975 Mar; 31(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 1164528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.