236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 511523)
1. Reproduction, ethics, and public policy: the federal sterilization regulations.
Petchesky RP
Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Oct; 9(5):29-41. PubMed ID: 511523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New sterilization regs lengthen waiting time to 30 days.
Drug Res Rep; 1978 Nov; 21(46):RN-4. PubMed ID: 12335456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The international medicolegal status of sterilization for mentally handicapped people.
Gonzales B
J Reprod Med; 1982 May; 27(5):257-8. PubMed ID: 7108860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Women: sterilization guidelines.
Evanoff R
Health PAC Bull; 1978; (80):19-20. PubMed ID: 10306863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sterilization regs: controversy continues.
Pilpel HF; Paul EW
PP News; 1979; 2(1):4. PubMed ID: 12335930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fertility-related state laws enacted in 1981.
Donovan P
Fam Plann Perspect; 1982; 14(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 7047208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New regulations governing DHEW sterilization funding now in effect; stress informed consent.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1979; 11(1):46-7. PubMed ID: 421881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
Nestor B; Gold RB
Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1983.
Gold RB; Nestor B
Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 3884361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidelines on sterilization under attack.
Rodriguez-Trias H
Women Health; 1976; 1(1):30-1. PubMed ID: 10236581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Public funding for U.S. contraceptive services down since 1980 -- $95 million a year goes to sterilization.
Sukop S
AVSC News; 1992 Mar; 30(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 12285114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DHEW proposes 30-day waiting period for sterilizations; no funds for under 21s, contraceptive hysterectomies.
Fam Plann Perspect; 1978; 10(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 340251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Coerced sterilization under federally funded family planning programs.
Diamond E
New Engl Law Rev; 1976; 11(2):589-614. PubMed ID: 11664603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A national sterilization policy: no consensus, especially for the mentally incompetent.
Hart DS
Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1978 Jun; 7(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 12260349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Safeguards proposed for subsidized sterilizations.
Wilson PD
Zero Popul Growth Natl Rep; 1978 Dec; 9(10):2. PubMed ID: 12143578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1985.
Gold RB; Macias J
Fam Plann Perspect; 1986; 18(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 3817122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
Sayeed SA
Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lost in a doctrinal wasteland: the exceptionalism of doctor-patient speech within the Rehnquist Court's First Amendment jurisprudence.
Berg PE
Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):153-77. PubMed ID: 10182216
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The ethics of research without consent in emergency situations.
Richardson LD
Mt Sinai J Med; 2005 Jul; 72(4):242-9. PubMed ID: 16021318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
