These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 511664)

  • 1. Speech discrimination in children: auditory and auditory/visual processing with binaural and monaural presentation.
    Yonovitz A; Dickenson P; Miller D; Spydell J
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):60-4. PubMed ID: 511664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S).
    Cameron S; Dillon H
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):196-211. PubMed ID: 17496671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow.
    Gray L; Kesser B; Cole E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monaural vs binaural speech reception threshold and word discrimination scores in the hearing impaired.
    Siegenthaler BM; Craig CH
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):133-5. PubMed ID: 7052803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.
    Feuerstein JF
    Ear Hear; 1992 Apr; 13(2):80-6. PubMed ID: 1601196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy.
    Zeng FG; Liu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 16671850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Binaural intelligibility prediction based on the speech transmission index.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Drullman R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4514-23. PubMed ID: 18537400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Auditory evoked potentials in the detection of interaural intensity differences in children and adults.
    Wambacq IJ; Koehnke J; Shea-Miller KJ; Besing J; Toth V; Abubakr A
    Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):320-31. PubMed ID: 17485981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
    Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech recognition abilities in noise for children with severe-to-profound unilateral hearing impairment.
    Ruscetta MN; Arjmand EM; Pratt SR
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 69(6):771-9. PubMed ID: 15885329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performance in children with hearing aids or cochlear implants: bilateral stimulation and binaural hearing.
    Ching TY; van Wanrooy E; Hill M; Incerti P
    Int J Audiol; 2006; 45 Suppl 1():S108-12. PubMed ID: 16938782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility with frequency-dependent interaural phase differences.
    Beutelmann R; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1359-68. PubMed ID: 19739750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random Gap Detection Test and Random Gap Detection Test-Expanded results in children with auditory neuropathy.
    Yalçinkaya F; Muluk NB; Ataş A; Keith RW
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Nov; 73(11):1558-63. PubMed ID: 19735949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Activation of human auditory cortex during speech perception: effects of monaural, binaural, and dichotic presentation.
    Stefanatos GA; Joe WQ; Aguirre GK; Detre JA; Wetmore G
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):301-15. PubMed ID: 18023460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Speech intelligibility enhancement by interaural magnification.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():215-23. PubMed ID: 2356730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory and auditory-visual intelligibility of speech in fluctuating maskers for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bernstein JG; Grant KW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3358-72. PubMed ID: 19425676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition in patients after successful surgery for unilateral congenital ear anomalies.
    Snik FM; Teunissen B; Cremers WR
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Aug; 104(8 Pt 1):1029-34. PubMed ID: 8052068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.