125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 511665)
1. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: cochlear-impaired listeners.
Keith RW
J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 511665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: normal-hearing listeners.
Keith RW
J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 422427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An acoustic reflex technique of establishing hearing aid settings.
Keith RW
J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 511666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and acoustic reflex threshold as a function of hearing loss.
Charuhas PA; Chung DY; Barry S
J Aud Res; 1978 Oct; 18(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 756864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
Donaldson GS; Allen SL
Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Excursion size Bekesy tracings of continuous and interrupted tones at threshold and at most comfortable loudness in cochlear-impaired ears.
Dancer JE
J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 6677640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
Cox RM
J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of acoustic reflex on pure-tone thresholds in sensorineural patients.
Hammond JA; Pang-Ching GK
J Aud Res; 1979 Apr; 19(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 549912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners.
Beattie RC; Zentil A; Svihovec DA
J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7187912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Relationship between loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired individuals.
McLeod HL; Greenberg HJ
J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Dec; 22(4):873-83. PubMed ID: 513694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
Narendran MM; Humes LE
Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
