These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 511665)

  • 1. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):65-70. PubMed ID: 511665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Loudness and the acoustic reflex: normal-hearing listeners.
    Keith RW
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):152-6. PubMed ID: 422427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An acoustic reflex technique of establishing hearing aid settings.
    Keith RW
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
    Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and acoustic reflex threshold as a function of hearing loss.
    Charuhas PA; Chung DY; Barry S
    J Aud Res; 1978 Oct; 18(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 756864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of presentation level on phoneme and sentence recognition in quiet by cochlear implant listeners.
    Donaldson GS; Allen SL
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):392-405. PubMed ID: 14534410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Timbre discrimination in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners under different noise conditions.
    Emiroglu S; Kollmeier B
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():199-207. PubMed ID: 17991457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restoration of loudness summation and differential loudness growth in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Strelcyk O; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2557-68. PubMed ID: 23039449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Excursion size Bekesy tracings of continuous and interrupted tones at threshold and at most comfortable loudness in cochlear-impaired ears.
    Dancer JE
    J Aud Res; 1983 Jan; 23(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 6677640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of acoustic reflex on pure-tone thresholds in sensorineural patients.
    Hammond JA; Pang-Ching GK
    J Aud Res; 1979 Apr; 19(2):95-8. PubMed ID: 549912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of white noise on the most comfortable level for speech with normal listeners.
    Beattie RC; Zentil A; Svihovec DA
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired individuals.
    McLeod HL; Greenberg HJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Dec; 22(4):873-83. PubMed ID: 513694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers.
    Narendran MM; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of speech presentation level on acceptance of noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Freyaldenhoven MC; Plyler PN; Thelin JW; Hedrick MS
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Aug; 50(4):878-85. PubMed ID: 17675593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contribution of high-frequency information to the acceptance of background noise in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Plyler PN; Madix SG; Thelin JW; Johnston KW
    Am J Audiol; 2007 Dec; 16(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 18056883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.