These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 511665)

  • 21. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
    Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Relationships among speech threshold, loudness discomfort, comfortable loudness, and PB max in the elderly hearing impaired.
    Beattie RC; Warren VG
    Am J Otol; 1982 Apr; 3(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7081412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aided and unaided narrow band noise thresholds in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Garstecki DC; Bode DL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 1(6):258-62. PubMed ID: 931761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort level: relationships in children with profound hearing losses.
    Holmes DW; Woodford CM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 2(6):193-6. PubMed ID: 893187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Can maximum comfortable loudness levels in hearing impaired listeners be predicted from ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds recorded with high frequency probes?
    Rawool VW
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 11409793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The controversial relationship between loudness discomfort levels and acoustic reflex thresholds.
    Ritter R; Johnson RM; Northern JL
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979; 4(4):123-31. PubMed ID: 422423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of normal and impaired hearing. I. Loudness, localization.
    Scharf B
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):49-79. PubMed ID: 292154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level.
    Fortune T; Scheller T
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 10981609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Measurement and modeling of binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Gibbs A; Onions G; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):736-47. PubMed ID: 25096108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The relationship between the uncomfortable loudness level and the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones in normally-hearing and impaired listeners--a meta-analysis.
    Olsen SO
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 10206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The stability of and the relation between the acoustic reflex and uncomfortable loudness levels.
    Forquer BD
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 511663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The relationship between the acoustic reflex threshold and levels of loudness categories in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):308-11. PubMed ID: 10582531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Acoustic reflex latency as a function of frequency and intensity of eliciting stimulus.
    Ruth RA; Niswander PS
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1976; 2(2):54-60. PubMed ID: 185181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. SSW test performance-intensity functions for hearing-impaired adults.
    Flynn PA; Danhauer JL; Gerber SE; Goller MC; Arnst DJ
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):346-8. PubMed ID: 6510580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgments.
    Kamm C; Dirks DD; Mickey MR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Dec; 21(4):668-81. PubMed ID: 745368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intensity just-noticeable differences at equal-loudness levels in normal and pathological ears.
    Stillman JA; Zwislocki JJ; Zhang M; Cefaratti LK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jan; 93(1):425-34. PubMed ID: 8423259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 10582530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Hypersensitivity to sound--questionnaire data, audiometry and classification.
    Anari M; Axelsson A; Eliasson A; Magnusson L
    Scand Audiol; 1999; 28(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 10572967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The acoustic reflex threshold in relation to noise-induced hearing loss.
    Lindgren F; Nilsson R; Axelsson A
    Scand Audiol; 1983; 12(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 6844871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.