These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 511665)

  • 41. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hall JW; Harvey AD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 4046585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Plasticity and modified loudness following short-term unilateral deprivation: evidence of multiple gain mechanisms within the auditory system.
    Munro KJ; Turtle C; Schaette R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):315-22. PubMed ID: 24437771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. End level bias on direct loudness ratings of increasing sounds.
    Susini P; Meunier S; Trapeau R; Chatron J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):EL163-8. PubMed ID: 20968320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Loudness discomfort level in normal hearing individuals].
    Knobel KA; Sanchez TG
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 16625869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The contribution of the acoustic reflex to the ascending-descending most comfortable loudness gap.
    Spitzer JB; Ventry IM; Nicholas JA
    Audiology; 1978; 17(3):271-80. PubMed ID: 666661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Relative loudness perception of low and high frequency sounds in the open and occluded ear.
    Keidser G; Katsch R; Dillon H; Grant F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3351-7. PubMed ID: 10875380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Mid-bandwidth loudness depression in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Hots J; Jarzombek K; Verhey JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2334. PubMed ID: 27250129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Most comfortable loudness shift as a measure of speech attenuation by hearing protectors.
    Letowski T; Burstein N; Clark J; Romanowski L; Sevec A
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1995 Apr; 56(4):356-61. PubMed ID: 7726101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Psychometric functions for loudness discomfort and most comfortable loudness levels.
    Dirks DD; Kamm C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Dec; 19(4):613-27. PubMed ID: 1003944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The objective estimation of loudness discomfort level using auditory brainstem evoked responses.
    Thornton AR; Yardley L; Farrell G
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 3438704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Most comfortable loudness for pure tones and speech in the presence of masking noise.
    Richards AM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Sep; 18(3):498-505. PubMed ID: 1186159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Most comfortable listening for the loudness and intelligibility of speech.
    Hochberg I
    Audiology; 1975; 14(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1147843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Brainstem plasticity and modified loudness following short-term use of hearing aids.
    Munro KJ; Merrett JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):343-9. PubMed ID: 23297907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for speech stimuli.
    Morgan DE; Dirks DD; Bower D; Kamm CA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Dec; 22(4):849-61. PubMed ID: 513692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of signal bandwidth upon threshold of the acoustic reflex and upon loudness.
    Gorga MP; Lilly DJ; Lenth RV
    Audiology; 1980; 19(4):277-92. PubMed ID: 7378023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Acoustic-reflex dynamics and the loudness-discomfort level.
    Greenfield DG; Wiley TL; Block MG
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1985 Feb; 50(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 3974207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Functional magnetic resonance imaging measurements of sound-level encoding in the absence of background scanner noise.
    Hall DA; Haggard MP; Summerfield AQ; Akeroyd MA; Palmer AR; Bowtell RW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1559-70. PubMed ID: 11325127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Aided loudness growth and satisfaction with everyday loudness perception in compression hearing aid users.
    Shi LF; Doherty KA; Zwislockit JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2007 Mar; 18(3):206-19. PubMed ID: 17479614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intensity resolution and loudness in broadband noise.
    Schlauch RS; Harvey S; Lanthier N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1895-902. PubMed ID: 7593914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effects of ear canal occlusion on hearing sensitivity: A loudness experiment.
    Bonnet F; Nélisse H; Voix J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Jun; 143(6):3574. PubMed ID: 29960431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.