BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 512205)

  • 1. BSR (wave V) and N1 latencies in response to acoustic stimuli with different bandwidths.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Aug; 66(2):446-55. PubMed ID: 512205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forward masking of auditory nerve (N1) and brainstem (wave V) responses in humans.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Sep; 72(3):795-803. PubMed ID: 7130538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustically dependent latency shifts of BSER (wave V) in man.
    Klein AJ; Teas DC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jun; 63(6):1887-95. PubMed ID: 681621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forward masking of auditory nerve and brainstem responses using high-pass noise maskers.
    Kramer SJ; Teas DC
    Hear Res; 1982 Dec; 8(3):317-37. PubMed ID: 7153185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An analysis of auditory brainstem responses in infants.
    Teas DC; Klein AJ; Kramer SJ
    Hear Res; 1982 May; 7(1):19-54. PubMed ID: 7096216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in humans using high-pass noise masking. II. Effect of click intensity.
    Eggermont JJ; Don M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1671-5. PubMed ID: 7462466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory brain stem potentials evoked by clicks in notch-filtered masking noise.
    Pratt H; Bleich N
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982 Apr; 53(4):417-26. PubMed ID: 6175503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain-stem responses when masking with wide-band and high-pass filtered noise.
    Thümmler I; Tietze G; Matkei P
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7323676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normal short-latency electrophysiological filtered click responses recorded from vertex and external auditory meatus.
    Coats AC; Martin JL; Kidder HR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1979 Mar; 65(3):747-58. PubMed ID: 447907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ipsilateral, contralateral, and binaural masking effects on the human brain-stem auditory-evoked responses to click stimuli.
    Owen GA; Burkard R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Apr; 89(4 Pt 1):1760-7. PubMed ID: 2045584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The brain-stem auditory-evoked response in the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) to clicks and frequency-modulated sweeps.
    Burkard R; Moss CF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Aug; 96(2 Pt 1):801-10. PubMed ID: 7930082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of broadband noise on the human brainstem auditory evoked response. II. Frequency specificity.
    Burkard R; Hecox K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1214-23. PubMed ID: 6643844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of signal-to-noise ratio on the auditory brainstem response to 0.5 and 2 kHz tone bursts in broadband noise and highpass noise or notch noise.
    Beattie RC; Aleks LA; Abbott CL
    Scand Audiol; 1994; 23(4):211-23. PubMed ID: 7878372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain stem auditory potentials evoked by clicks in the presence of high-pass filtered noise in dogs.
    Poncelet L; Deltenre P; Coppens A; Michaux C; Coussart E
    Res Vet Sci; 2006 Apr; 80(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16002109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of N1 of the whole nerve action potential and wave i of the brain-stem auditory evoked response in Mongolian gerbil.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF; Smith RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Apr; 93(4 Pt 1):2069-76. PubMed ID: 8473619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Effect of stimulus rise time and high-pass masking on early auditory evoked potentials].
    Bunke D; von Specht H; Mühler R; Pethe J; Kevanishvili Z
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Apr; 77(4):185-90. PubMed ID: 9592750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Auditory brainstem response in the cat. Effect of masking level on derived-band contributions.
    Mair IW; Laukli E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1987; 103(5-6):586-92. PubMed ID: 3618185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the click-evoked brainstem potentials in man unsing high-pass noise masking.
    Don M; Eggermont JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Apr; 63(4):1084-92. PubMed ID: 649867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). II: Effects of broadband noise level and high-pass masker cutoff frequency across click polarity.
    Burkard R; Voigt HF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jun; 85(6):2526-36. PubMed ID: 2745877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of broadband noise on the human brain-stem auditory evoked response. IV. Additivity of forward-masking and rate-induced wave V latency shifts.
    Burkard R; Hecox KE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Apr; 81(4):1064-72. PubMed ID: 3571722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.