These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 512569)

  • 1. Comparison of yes-no and latency measures of auditory intensity discrimination.
    Green M; Terman M; Terman JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):363-72. PubMed ID: 512569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time errors and differential sensation weighting.
    Hellström A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):460-77. PubMed ID: 528952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory discrimination: role of time and intensity in the precedence effect.
    Hoeffding V; Harrison JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 501269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of pentobarbital, d-amphetamine, and nicotine on two models of sustained attention in pigeons.
    Lemmonds CA; Williams DK; Wenger GR
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2002 Oct; 163(3-4):391-8. PubMed ID: 12373439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Latency differentiation of hits and false alarms in an operant-psychophysical test.
    Terman M; Terman JS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Nov; 20(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 4759061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Detection of increments in noise intensity by monkeys.
    Clopton BM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1972 May; 17(3):473-81. PubMed ID: 4624513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detection of brief tones in noise by rats.
    Irwin RJ; Terman M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Mar; 13(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 5494896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Go-no-go performance in pathological gamblers.
    Kertzman S; Lowengrub K; Aizer A; Vainder M; Kotler M; Dannon PN
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Oct; 161(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 18789539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neuromagnetic evaluation of binaural unmasking.
    Sasaki T; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Ogura M; Tominaga T; Kobayashi T
    Neuroimage; 2005 Apr; 25(3):684-9. PubMed ID: 15808969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interaural correlation and the binaural summation of loudness.
    Edmonds BA; Culling JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3865-70. PubMed ID: 19507969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Human auditory steady-state responses during sweeps of intensity.
    Picton TW; van Roon P; John MS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):542-57. PubMed ID: 17609615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Responses of neurons of the medial geniculate body in the cat to positive and negative intensity increments in noise signals].
    Stukova OV; Zhukova MG; Granstrem MP
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1983 Nov; 69(11):1441-8. PubMed ID: 6653825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral loudness summation for sequences of short noise bursts.
    Verhey JL; Uhlemann M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):925-34. PubMed ID: 18247895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The detection of visual signals by macaque frontal eye field during masking.
    Thompson KG; Schall JD
    Nat Neurosci; 1999 Mar; 2(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 10195223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The growing-louder effect in short diotic stimuli.
    Reinhardt-Rutland AH; Ehrenstein WH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Aug; 83(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 8873174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of response bias and judgment framing on operator use of an automated aid in a target detection task.
    Rice S; McCarley JS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):320-31. PubMed ID: 21707202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Discrimination of auditory intensities by rats.
    Terman M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Mar; 13(2):145-60. PubMed ID: 5494897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision theory analysis of response latencies in vigilance.
    Parasuraman R; Davies DR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1976 Nov; 2(4):578-90. PubMed ID: 1011007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric functions for the discrimination of differences in intensity of Gaussian noise.
    Irwin RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1989 Nov; 41(4):655-74. PubMed ID: 2587793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response latency, latency-based receiver-operating characteristics, and uncertainty about interaural phase in the detection of in-phase and out-of-phase tones presented in noise.
    Emmerich DS; Brown WS; Thoms JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Jul; 94(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 8354761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.