These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 5125727)

  • 1. Most comfortable loudness for pure tones, noise, and speech.
    Ventry IM; Woods RW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1971 Jun; 49(6):1805-13. PubMed ID: 5125727
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of noise bandwidth on the loudness of a 1000-Hz tone.
    Hellman RP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1970 Aug; 48(2):500-4. PubMed ID: 5470496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relation between loudness and intensity difference limens for tones in quiet and noise backgrounds.
    Rankovic CM; Viemeister NF; Fantini DA; Cheesman MF; Uchiyama CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):150-5. PubMed ID: 3411042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perception of pitch height in lexical and musical tones by English-speaking musicians and nonmusicians.
    Lee CY; Lekich A; Zhang Y
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1607-15. PubMed ID: 24606295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual differences in auditory abilities.
    Kidd GR; Watson CS; Gygi B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):418-35. PubMed ID: 17614500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.
    Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comfortable loudness judgments for discrete frequency signals.
    Berger KW; Harrison LD; Monack N; Ferren GE
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 7345058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of small changes in frequency on clinically determined estimates of auditory threshold.
    Woodford CM
    ASHA; 1984 Apr; 26(4):25-30. PubMed ID: 6732892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On the relation between the growth of loudness and the discrimination of intensity for pure tones.
    Hellman R; Scharf B; Teghtsoonian M; Teghtsoonian R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Aug; 82(2):448-53. PubMed ID: 3624649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch.
    Li X; Jeng FC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL21-6. PubMed ID: 21302977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhanced pure-tone pitch discrimination among persons with autism but not Asperger syndrome.
    Bonnel A; McAdams S; Smith B; Berthiaume C; Bertone A; Ciocca V; Burack JA; Mottron L
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2465-75. PubMed ID: 20433857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Auditory threshold drift for sinus signals and noise in normal hearing and in noise-damaged subjects].
    Fischer R; Gentz HD
    Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1971; 199(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 5153164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multihandicapped children's preferences for pure tones and speech stimuli as a method of assessing auditory capabilities.
    Silva DA; Friedlander BZ; Knight MS
    Am J Ment Defic; 1978 Jul; 83(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 150230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical and social aspects of speech audiometry. A comparative study of various speech audiometric materials].
    Parving A; Barfod J; Salomon G
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1976 Jan; 138(4):237-40. PubMed ID: 1251486
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.